[Bug fortran/85352] Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY

2018-04-12 Thread mecej4 at outlook dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85352 --- Comment #3 from mecej4 --- I found a server that had an older version of GCC, on which the test code compiled without error messages from the compiler: gcc version 4.4.7 20120313 (Red Hat 4.4.7-16) (GCC)

[Bug fortran/85352] Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY

2018-04-11 Thread mecej4 at outlook dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85352 --- Comment #1 from mecej4 --- The bug goes away if some apparently unrelated changes are made. For example, if "ENTRY rfinit" is commented out, the bug is not seen.

[Bug fortran/85352] New: Incorrect error diagnosed for dummy argument used in specification expression to subprogram with ENTRY

2018-04-11 Thread mecej4 at outlook dot com
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mecej4 at outlook dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 43912 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43912&acti

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

2018-02-09 Thread mecej4 at outlook dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 --- Comment #13 from mecej4 --- Thanks for locating the relevant clauses. With your extracts serving as a roadmap, I can find essentially the same wording in F2003, but with different numbers for rules and constraints, in section 12.4. R1217 fun

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

2018-02-09 Thread mecej4 at outlook dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 --- Comment #10 from mecej4 --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #9) > On Fri, Feb 09, 2018 at 01:52:03PM +0000, mecej4 at outlook dot com wrote: > > (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #7) > > > ... > > >

[Bug fortran/84276] Invalid error for valid statement function

2018-02-09 Thread mecej4 at outlook dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84276 mecej4 changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mecej4 at outlook dot com --- Comment #8 from