https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #5 from Tomasz Konojacki ---
To sum this thread up, there are undocumented rules that can cause a
semantically identical program to be rejected by the compiler under certain
optimisation levels (with an uninformative error message) a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
--- Comment #1 from Tomasz Konojacki ---
(In reply to Tomasz Konojacki from comment #0)
> The error below occurs only with -Od.
Sorry, -Og.
PS. It seems that moving the definition of fun4 to the first line
makes the error disappear.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107931
Bug ID: 107931
Summary: [12 Regression] -Od causes always_inline to fail
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537
Bug ID: 101537
Summary: -Wconversion false positive in ternary
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
--- Comment #18 from Tomasz Konojacki ---
Sorry, it still warns in C mode, but it doesn't in C++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93652
Tomasz Konojacki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at xenu dot pl
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53277
Tomasz Konojacki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at xenu dot pl
--- Comment #17 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38522
Tomasz Konojacki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||me at xenu dot pl
--- Comment #10 fro
