[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2023-03-13 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #25 from James McKelvey --- I just tried the latest snapshot and it works great, no need to specify --disable-multilib.

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2023-02-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #18 from James McKelvey --- I don't know. How do I tell? I'm pretty sure they are just 64-bit.

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2023-02-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #16 from James McKelvey --- $ find /usr/local/lib/gcc -name libgcc_s\*.dll -o -name libgcc.a /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/11.3.1/libgcc.a /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/12.1.1/libgcc.a /usr/local/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2023-02-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #14 from James McKelvey --- Okay I installed gcc-12, built about 10/29/2022: $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/12.2.1/lto-wrapper.exe Target: x86_64-pc-cygwin

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2022-12-23 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #11 from James McKelvey --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #10) > Can you try to revert my patches: > f0d3b6e384a68f8b58bc750f240a15cad92600cd > ccb9c7b129206209cfc315ab1a0432b5f517bdd9 > and remove your patch at comment #

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2022-12-10 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #8 from James McKelvey --- Okay I backed out the fix to t-cygwin-w64 and tried to build again with --disable-multilib and stil got the "no dirname" error. So that fix is definitely needed.

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2022-12-10 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #7 from James McKelvey --- That fix let the build proceed until it hit a #error much later. See 108011. Cygwin seems to be removing support for 32-bit, so although multilib has built for years, it won't anymore. That's my take. I'm

[Bug target/108011] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin: ‘uc_mcontext’ has incomplete type

2022-12-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108011 James McKelvey changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |FIXED --- Comment #6 from James McKelv

[Bug target/108011] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin: ‘uc_mcontext’ has incomplete type

2022-12-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108011 --- Comment #4 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 54037 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54037&action=edit signal.h

[Bug bootstrap/108011] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin: ‘uc_mcontext’ has incomplete type

2022-12-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108011 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 54036 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54036&action=edit Config log

[Bug bootstrap/108011] New: [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin: ‘uc_mcontext’ has incomplete type

2022-12-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 54035 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54035&acti

[Bug target/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2022-12-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #5 from James McKelvey --- This works: $ diff gcc/config/i386/t-cygwin-w64~ gcc/config/i386/t-cygwin-w64 2c2 < MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 64 --- > MULTILIB_DIRNAMES = 64 32

[Bug c++/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2022-12-06 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #2 from James McKelvey --- Configured with: ./configure --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-threads=posix

[Bug c++/107998] [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2022-12-06 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107998 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 54032 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54032&action=edit Config log

[Bug c++/107998] New: [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221204 failure to build on Cygwin No dirname for option: m32

2022-12-06 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 54031 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54031&action=edit Build lo

[Bug c++/107511] New: [13 Regression] gcc-13-20221030 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack of secure_getenv

2022-11-02 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 53822 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53822&action=edit Bu

[Bug c++/106128] Bogus Warning on static_cast double to bool with -Wfloat-equal

2022-06-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106128 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- I guess I should say recent Windows 10 with Cygwin.

[Bug c++/106128] New: Bogus Warning on static_cast double to bool with -Wfloat-equal

2022-06-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- static_cast should not warn on its internals. int main() { double xx(0.0); // Warning bool y

[Bug tree-optimization/105651] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string

2022-05-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 --- Comment #4 from James McKelvey --- Still fails with gcc-12-20220521 and gcc-13-20220522, but not gcc-11-20220520.

[Bug c++/105651] Failure compiling constexpr/__builtin_memcpy on Cygwin with -std=c++20

2022-05-18 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 52991 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52991&action=edit save-temps

[Bug c++/105651] New: Failure compiling constexpr/__builtin_memcpy on Cygwin with -std=c++20

2022-05-18 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 52990 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52990&action=edit Build.log showing error

[Bug libstdc++/105540] [11 Regression] gcc-11-20220506 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack of secure_getenv

2022-05-09 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105540 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 52946 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52946&action=edit Config log

[Bug libstdc++/105540] New: gcc-11-20220506 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack of secure_getenv

2022-05-09 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 52945 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52945&action=edit Build.log showin

[Bug libstdc++/104830] Errors Building gcc-12-20220306 under Cygwin: __terminate and more

2022-03-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104830 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 52576 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52576&action=edit Config log

[Bug libstdc++/104830] New: Errors Building gcc-12-20220306 under Cygwin: __terminate and more

2022-03-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 52575 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52575&action=edit Complete build log Up-

[Bug bootstrap/104536] gcc-12-20220213 Fails to build on Cygwin: contraction ‘can%'t’ in format

2022-02-14 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104536 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 52441 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52441&action=edit Config log

[Bug bootstrap/104536] New: gcc-12-20220213 Fails to build on Cygwin: contraction ‘can%'t’ in format

2022-02-14 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
erity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 52440 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52440&action=edit Log of

[Bug bootstrap/104217] gcc-12-20220123 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack of secure_getenv

2022-01-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217 --- Comment #5 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 52284 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52284&action=edit Config log

[Bug bootstrap/104217] gcc-12-20220123 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack of secure_getenv

2022-01-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104217 --- Comment #2 from James McKelvey --- Builds with gcc-11-20220122.

[Bug bootstrap/104217] New: gcc-12-20220123 failure to build on Cygwin due to lack of secure_getenv

2022-01-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 52283 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52283&action=edit Tarball of attempte

[Bug bootstrap/101369] Bootstrap failure of gcc-12-20210704 on Cygwin

2021-07-08 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101369 --- Comment #4 from James McKelvey --- Probably duplicate of 101377 for 11.1.1. I see error for 11 and 12.

[Bug bootstrap/101369] Bootstrap failure of gcc-12-20210704 on Cygwin

2021-07-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101369 James McKelvey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mckelvey at maskull dot com

[Bug bootstrap/101369] New: Bootstrap failure of gcc-12-20210704 on Cygwin

2021-07-07 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 51114 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51114&action=edit Tarball of build.log and config.log Recent gcc-11 and gcc-12 sn

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with/without optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #24 from James McKelvey --- Running Cygwin 3.2.0(0.340/5/3) under Windows 10. Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/usr/local/bin/g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-cygwin/11.1.1/lto-wrapper.exe Target: x86_64-pc-

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with/without optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #18 from James McKelvey --- If I build with -D_GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI=0 it all works. But with =1 I get the mismatches.

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with/without optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #17 from James McKelvey --- Sorry, that constructor is in the .cc file. Looks like the .cc contents weren't picked up by the attempt to get the preprocessed source. BreakPattern:: BreakPattern(const pdstring& val

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with/without optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #16 from James McKelvey --- The Break's are actually functions that call the constructor. They look like this: inline BreakPattern Break(const AbstractStringScalarValue& value, const ComplementEnum&a_complement =

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with/without optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #15 from James McKelvey --- The Break's are actually functions that call the constructor. They look like this: inline BreakPattern Break(const AbstractStringScalarValue& value, const ComplementEnum&a_complement =

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with/without optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 James McKelvey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mckelvey at maskull dot com

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with/without optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #12 from James McKelvey --- I don't see _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI anywhere in the code.

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with/without optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #11 from James McKelvey --- I don't see _GLIBCXX_USE_CXX11_ABI anywhere in the code.

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #10 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 50824 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50824&action=edit Preprocessed source for main

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with optimization

2021-05-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #9 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 50823 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50823&action=edit Preprocessed source for BreakPattern.h

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with optimization

2021-05-16 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #2 from James McKelvey --- Occurs with and without optimization. I'll compare errors between the two.

[Bug c++/100629] Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with optimization

2021-05-16 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100629 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 50821 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50821&action=edit Source of Main

[Bug c++/100629] New: Regression from 10 symbol mismatch between class definition and use with optimization

2021-05-16 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mckelvey at maskull dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 50820 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50820&action=edit Source o

[Bug bootstrap/43619] Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-05 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #12 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-04-05 14:36 --- (In reply to comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > (In reply to comment #8) > > > > > cygcheck shows a reference to a sjlj dll, > > > > Woah, deja vu! > > &

[Bug bootstrap/43619] Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-02 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #11 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-04-02 22:31 --- (In reply to comment #10) > (In reply to comment #8) > > > cygcheck shows a reference to a sjlj dll, > > Woah, deja vu! > > > although --disable-sjlj-exceptions is specified: > &

[Bug bootstrap/43619] Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #9 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-04-01 21:22 --- Created an attachment (id=20280) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20280&action=view) libgcc config.log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43619

[Bug bootstrap/43619] Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #8 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-04-01 21:20 --- (In reply to comment #5) > You have a bad c++ in your path: > > configure:4892: checking whether we are using the GNU C++ compiler > configure:4911: c++ -c conftest.cpp >&5 > /usr/local/libe

[Bug bootstrap/43619] Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #7 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-04-01 19:02 --- (In reply to comment #4) > >--disable-bootstrap > > What happens if you remove that part? Disabling bootstrap for native builds > are > not really supported. > No difference. -- http:/

[Bug bootstrap/43619] Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-04-01 15:10 --- Created an attachment (id=20277) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20277&action=view) Log from bootstrap -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43619

[Bug bootstrap/43619] Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #2 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-04-01 15:10 --- Created an attachment (id=20276) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20276&action=view) Log from ./configure -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43619

[Bug bootstrap/43619] Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #1 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-04-01 15:09 --- Created an attachment (id=20275) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20275&action=view) Output from ./configure -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43619

[Bug bootstrap/43619] New: Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check

2010-04-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
7;'-g -O'\'' 2>&1 | tee log' I'll attach the full log and the log from configure. -- Summary: Bootstrap failure: "/lib/cpp" fails sanity check Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/32192] Assembler errors compiling g++

2010-03-26 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-03-26 16:51 --- (In reply to comment #2) > James, you reported this against 4.3.0. I've just tried your testcase against > both 4.3.4 and HEAD, neither of which had any problem; can you see if you > still > get it

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2010-03-26 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #17 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-03-26 16:48 --- (In reply to comment #16) > (In reply to comment #15) > > (In reply to comment #14) > > > > So I guess that the build and install recreates those rogue dlls. > > > > > > >

[Bug bootstrap/43541] New: Warning Treated as Error

2010-03-26 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mckelvey at maskull dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://g

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2010-03-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #15 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-03-24 18:26 --- (In reply to comment #14) > I now see that sjlj dll is back in /usr/local/bin, along with the other one. I > delete them, and the new g++ works. At least it compiles to a .o again. We'll > see if my pr

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2010-03-23 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #14 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-03-24 04:57 --- I now see that sjlj dll is back in /usr/local/bin, along with the other one. I delete them, and the new g++ works. At least it compiles to a .o again. We'll see if my project actually runs properly. So I guess

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2010-03-23 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #13 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-03-24 02:35 --- OK, I deleted those odd dlls and I was able to bootstrap. I installed, and the resulting g++ errors out with a status of 1 on any input. No error messages at all. $ g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2010-03-21 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #10 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-03-22 02:00 --- OK I've been busy. I've replaced the old computer with a Windows 7 box, and reinstalled cygwin from scratch. I get the same thing: checking for i686-pc-cygwin-gcc... /cygdrive/j/Home/cvsroot/gcc-obj/./g

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2010-01-01 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #7 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2010-01-02 01:27 --- OK I do not know this code. But it looks to me like it never even looks at the source file. It fails because do_spec doesn't seem to find anything to do. (gdb) print spec $12 = 0x427e24 "%{E|M|MM:%(trad_c

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2009-12-29 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #6 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-12-30 02:28 --- Here's what I get in the debugger with -v: (gdb) run -B/cygdrive/e/Home/cvsroot/gcc-obj/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ -B/usr/local/i686-pc-cygwin/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/i686-pc-cygwin/include -isystem

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2009-12-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #4 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-12-28 23:58 --- Correction, I used the cygwin compiler to bootstrap this time. $ /usr/bin/gcc.exe -v Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-cygwin Configured with: /gnu/gcc/releases/packaging/4.3.4-3/gcc4-4.3.4-3/src/gcc-4.3.4

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2009-12-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-12-28 23:54 --- $ report.sh uname -a CYGWIN_NT-5.1 MCKELVEY-XP 1.7.1(0.218/5/3) 2009-12-07 11:48 i686 Cygwin g++ -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=g++ COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/i686-pc-cygwin/4.5.0/lto-wrapper.exe

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2009-12-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #2 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-12-28 23:53 --- Created an attachment (id=19407) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19407&action=view) config.log from point of error -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42529

[Bug bootstrap/42529] Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2009-12-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #1 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-12-28 23:52 --- Created an attachment (id=19406) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19406&action=view) Build log -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42529

[Bug bootstrap/42529] New: Stage 1 compiler cannot compile

2009-12-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
piler cannot compile Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mckelvey at maskull dot com GCC build triplet:

[Bug c++/35421] ICE on Valid Code

2009-12-27 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #9 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-12-28 02:07 --- (In reply to comment #8) > Feedback not forthcoming. > Will try again as soon as I can build latest SVN. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35421

[Bug lto/41821] ICE in LTO when linking

2009-10-26 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #5 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-10-27 01:04 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Subject: Re: ICE in LTO when linking > > On Sun, 25 Oct 2009, mckelvey at maskull dot com wrote: > > > > > > > ------- Comment #3 from mckelvey at mas

[Bug lto/41821] ICE in LTO when linking

2009-10-25 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-10-25 16:32 --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can you instead launch the link command-line with -v -save-temps appended > and from the output re-run the lto1 command invocation inside gdb and do > > (gdb) b internal_error

[Bug lto/41821] ICE in LTO when linking

2009-10-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #1 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-10-25 01:27 --- I presume that you will need stest0.o and libPatternDriver.a to recreate, but tarring and bz2ing those together yields about 25M, too much to attach. Please advise. -- mckelvey at maskull dot com changed

[Bug lto/41821] New: ICE in LTO when linking

2009-10-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mckelvey at maskull dot com GCC build triplet: alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41821

[Bug c++/41791] New: LTO warnings with -Winline

2009-10-21 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mckelvey at maskull dot com GCC build triplet: alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: alphaev56-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41791

[Bug bootstrap/41746] New: LTO Fails to bootstrap, stage 2

2009-10-18 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
7;\'' LIBCXXFLAGS='\''-g -O'\'' bootstrap 2>&1 | tee log' -- Summary: LTO Fails to bootstrap, stage 2 Product: gcc Version: lto Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/40723] Optimizer Causes Undefined References

2009-10-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-10-17 19:02 --- Latest from subversion, bug no longer occurs. I think we can close. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40723

[Bug target/40720] Optimizer Bug: bad register name

2009-10-17 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #2 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-10-17 18:59 --- (In reply to comment #1) > >I'm unsure how to proceed, as temp files > will be very large > > Zip them up. > I rebuilt from latest subversion and problem no longer occurs. We can close

[Bug target/40577] ICE on valid code: in extract_insn

2009-07-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #4 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-07-29 01:47 --- (In reply to comment #3) > Created an attachment (id=18254) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18254&action=view) [edit] > patch to fix the failure > > This patch fixes the failure

[Bug c++/40723] Optimizer Causes Undefined References

2009-07-11 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #1 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-07-12 00:13 --- Created an attachment (id=18178) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18178&action=view) Build that shows errors -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40723

[Bug c++/40723] New: Optimizer Causes Undefined References

2009-07-11 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
XXFLAGS='\''-O'\'' LIBCXXFLAGS='\''-g -O'\'' bootstrap 2>&1 | tee log' -- Summary: Optimizer Causes Undefined References Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c++/40720] New: Optimizer Bug: bad register name

2009-07-11 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mckelvey at maskull dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40720

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

2009-07-05 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #19 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-07-05 23:44 --- (In reply to comment #18) > As Dave suggests in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40455#c13, > this > is fixed, > I tried it yesterday, after updating with SVN and updating my 1.7 cygwin, and

[Bug bootstrap/40455] gcc trunk does not bootstrap as of commit r148408

2009-06-30 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #12 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-06-30 21:09 --- I see this too, as of today's SVN. $ alias CONFIGURECVS alias CONFIGURECVS='/cygdrive/e/Home/cvsroot/gcc/configure --verbose --enable-threads --disable-nls --enable-checking=release --enable-conc

[Bug bootstrap/40511] Bootstrap Failure in stage3: c++locale - Recent SVN

2009-06-29 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #10 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-06-29 17:46 --- (In reply to comment #9) > Ok, then for now let's close it as WONTFIX... > Problem. With --enable-clocale=generic even the most basic locale support has vanished. try { us_locale =

[Bug c++/40577] ICE on valid code: in extract_insn

2009-06-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #1 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-06-29 00:49 --- Created an attachment (id=18088) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18088&action=view) Preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40577

[Bug c++/40577] New: ICE on valid code: in extract_insn

2009-06-28 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
8 Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source if appropriate. See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions. -- Summary: ICE on valid code: in extract_insn Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug bootstrap/40511] Bootstrap Failure in stage3: c++locale - Recent SVN

2009-06-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #8 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-06-25 01:52 --- I was able to build with --enable-clocale=generic. Thanks! -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40511

[Bug bootstrap/40511] Bootstrap Failure in stage3: c++locale - Recent SVN

2009-06-23 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #7 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-06-24 02:47 --- (In reply to comment #6) > As far as I'm concerned, we could also close the PR as WONFIX, in particular > since we have an excellent workaround: --enable-clocale=generic. > I'm trying that now

[Bug bootstrap/40511] Bootstrap Failure in stage3: c++locale - Recent SVN

2009-06-22 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #4 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-06-23 03:04 --- (In reply to comment #3) > That was also my understanding. The funny thing is that apparently the builds > fails exactly on the macro and also that the configure tests apparently do not > select the gener

[Bug bootstrap/40511] New: Bootstrap Failure in stage3: c++locale - Recent SVN

2009-06-21 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
;\'' bootstrap 2>&1 | tee log' -- Summary: Bootstrap Failure in stage3: c++locale - Recent SVN Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap A

[Bug bootstrap/37660] [4.4 Regression] Error Building libssp, recent update

2009-01-24 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #19 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-01-25 01:21 --- Resolved and fixed. -- mckelvey at maskull dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status

[Bug bootstrap/37660] [4.4 Regression] Error Building libssp, recent update

2009-01-19 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #10 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2009-01-19 22:29 --- (In reply to comment #7) > Created an attachment (id=17132) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17132&action=view) [edit] > Move _ctors* and _chkstk* to import lib > > Danny, this i

[Bug bootstrap/37660] Error Building libssp, recent update

2008-11-29 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #1 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-11-29 18:59 --- Still getting this bootstrap error, as of yesterday's update. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37660

[Bug bootstrap/37655] Error Building libgcc_s.dll

2008-09-27 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-09-27 17:38 --- If I build from scratch with a svn update I get bug 37660. If I then build again I get 37655, so probably this bug is not important and just fixed by adding -f to ln as Brian says. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug bootstrap/37660] New: Error Building libssp, recent update

2008-09-27 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
p] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/cygdrive/f/Home/cvsroot/gcc-obj' make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 -- Summary: Error Building libssp, recent update Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug bootstrap/37655] Error Building libgcc_s.dll

2008-09-26 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #2 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-09-27 05:26 --- (In reply to comment #1) > Subject: Re: New: Error Building libgcc_s.dll > > The fact that the symlink already exists implies that the command failed > before and this is the result of running it again.

[Bug bootstrap/37655] New: Error Building libgcc_s.dll

2008-09-26 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
f/Home/cvsroot/gcc-obj' make: *** [bootstrap] Error 2 -- Summary: Error Building libgcc_s.dll Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mckelvey at maskull dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37655

[Bug bootstrap/37600] New: Bootstrap Failure with Undefined References

2008-09-20 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
n `emutls_destroy': /cygdrive/f/Home/cvsroot/gcc/libgcc/../gcc/emutls.c:76: undefined reference to `_free' /cygdrive/f/Home/cvsroot/gcc/libgcc/../gcc/emutls.c:79: undefined reference to `_free' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [libgcc_s.dll] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `

[Bug c++/37284] ICE on valid code with -fstrict-aliasing

2008-08-29 Thread mckelvey at maskull dot com
--- Comment #3 from mckelvey at maskull dot com 2008-08-30 00:14 --- Created an attachment (id=16168) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16168&action=view) Smaller test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37284

  1   2   >