https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83877
--- Comment #3 from Marco Castelluccio ---
The problem we have is that there's a directory containing gcno files and
multiple directories containing gcda files (one for each test suite execution).
gcov expects the gcda and gcno files to be in th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86536
--- Comment #4 from Marco Castelluccio ---
Sorry for the delay, it sounds fine to me, I can't think of anything better
than that!
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mcastelluccio at mozilla dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
-:0:Source:main.c
-:0:Graph:main.gcno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86411
Marco Castelluccio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86411
--- Comment #2 from Marco Castelluccio ---
Line 14 and line 16 should be "#" (not covered), instead they are "-" (not
coverable, a line not containing any code).
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mcastelluccio at mozilla dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
-:0:Source:main.c
-:0:Graph:main.gcno
-:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83878
Marco Castelluccio changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--- Comment #4 from Marco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83878
--- Comment #2 from Marco Castelluccio ---
Created attachment 44267
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44267&action=edit
Archive with GCNO, GCDA, source file and GCOV output
Sorry for replying late, but I just managed to find a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83879
--- Comment #4 from Marco Castelluccio ---
Would it be feasible to force exporting "__gcov_master" to the dynamic symbol
table when coverage instrumentation is enabled?
y: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mcastelluccio at mozilla dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 43144
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43144&action=
-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mcastelluccio at mozilla dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 43143
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43143&action=edit
Archive with GCN
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mcastelluccio at mozilla dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Sometimes they are not close to each other (e.g. if you build on one
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #10 from Marco Castelluccio ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> (In reply to Marco Castelluccio from comment #8)
> > Created attachment 42462 [details]
> > Archive with GCNO and GCDA file generated with GCC 6
> >
> > Thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82702
--- Comment #7 from Marco Castelluccio ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> Marco is right that it started with the mentioned revision. But let me start
> in more general context:
>
> Consider virtual.cpp file that includes some stan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82702
--- Comment #4 from Marco Castelluccio ---
I suppose this is a regression caused by
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/41da7513d5aaaff3a5651b40edeccc1e32ea785a.
Is it intentional?
Note that generating multiple files makes parsing slower,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82702
--- Comment #3 from Marco Castelluccio ---
See also this comment:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/3c311329bd71ab4589fced78baf30187e50b6d3f/gcc/gcov.c#L865.
This used to be true, but it's not anymore.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82702
--- Comment #2 from Marco Castelluccio ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Invoking-Gcov.html#Invoking-Gcov
>
> The output is a single .gcov file per .gcda file.
>
> The same documentation was i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #8 from Marco Castelluccio ---
Created attachment 42462
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42462&action=edit
Archive with GCNO and GCDA file generated with GCC 6
This is an archive containing the GCNO and GCDA files
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mcastelluccio at mozilla dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Running "gcov -i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #7 from Marco Castelluccio ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> (In reply to Marco Castelluccio from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Marco Castelluccio from comment #3)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #5 from Marco Castelluccio ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> (In reply to Marco Castelluccio from comment #3)
> > > Thanks for the report Marco. Looks it comes from Firefox, am I right?
> >
> > Yes, that's correct. Act
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #3 from Marco Castelluccio ---
> Thanks for the report Marco. Looks it comes from Firefox, am I right?
Yes, that's correct. Actually, from a build of the JS shell.
> Which version of GCC have you been using?
The build was done with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82614
--- Comment #1 from Marco Castelluccio ---
Created attachment 42399
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42399&action=edit
GCNO file
-profile
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: mcastelluccio at mozilla dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 42398
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42398&action=edit
GCDA file
This f
24 matches
Mail list logo
