[Bug fortran/81447] New: gfortran fails to recognize the exact dynamic type of a polymorphic entity that was allocated in a external procedure

2017-07-14 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
: 7.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mathewc at nag dot co.uk Target Milestone: --- > uname -a && gfortran --version && cat

[Bug fortran/77507] New: gfortran rejects keyworded calls to procedures from intrinsic modules

2016-09-07 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mathewc at nag dot co.uk Target Milestone: --- $ uname -a && gfortran --version && cat foo.f90 && gfortran foo.f90 Linux cuivienen.nag.co.uk 4.7.2-201.fc

[Bug libfortran/68987] New: double free or corruption in _gfortran_st_write_done when a write statement to an internal file uses an invalid format and the ERR= specifier appears.

2015-12-18 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
. Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mathewc at nag dot co.uk Target Milestone: --- I'm using >

[Bug fortran/64921] [4.9/5/6 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_allocate_18.f90

2015-04-27 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64921 --- Comment #14 from Mat Cross --- For the record, perhaps it is of interest for me to note that we are running into this (cf. PR64230 comment 9) on code like Program test Implicit None Type :: t1 Integer, Allocatable :: i End Type T

[Bug fortran/64230] [4.9/5 Regression] Invalid memory reference in a compiler-generated finalizer for allocatable component

2015-04-26 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64230 Mat Cross changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/64230] [4.9/5 Regression] Invalid memory reference in a compiler-generated finalizer for allocatable component

2015-04-24 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64230 Mat Cross changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/64230] New: Segmentation fault - invalid memory reference in a compiler-generated finalizer for a complicated type hierarchy when a polymorphic variable is allocated in an external proced

2014-12-08 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
an external procedure. Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mathewc at nag dot co.uk

[Bug fortran/59107] New: Spurious "Type specified for intrinsic function 'command_argument_count' at (1) is ignored" under -Wsurprising.

2013-11-13 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
Version: 4.8.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: mathewc at nag dot co.uk > cat test.f90 Program p Integer :: nargs Intrinsic :: command

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

2012-04-02 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 --- Comment #4 from Mat Cross 2012-04-02 08:03:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > Can you maybe check on trunk/4.7.0 ? I've just tried with $ gfortran --version GNU Fortran (GCC) 4.7.1 20120331 (prerelease) $ gfortran -c -Wunused-parameter

[Bug fortran/52789] gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

2012-03-30 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 --- Comment #2 from Mat Cross 2012-03-30 16:22:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > So? If I RTM I see: "-Wunused-parameter Contrary to gcc's meaning of -Wunused-parameter, gfortran's implementation of this option does not warn about unuse

[Bug fortran/52789] New: gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense

2012-03-30 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52789 Bug #: 52789 Summary: gfortran sets -Wunused-parameter in the C sense as well as the Fortran sense Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UN

[Bug fortran/52585] New: Dummy procedure pointer loses its pointer association status

2012-03-14 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52585 Bug #: 52585 Summary: Dummy procedure pointer loses its pointer association status Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/52542] New: Procedure with a Bind (C) named interface does not inherit the Bind (C)

2012-03-09 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52542 Bug #: 52542 Summary: Procedure with a Bind (C) named interface does not inherit the Bind (C) Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug libfortran/49885] New: Segmentation fault when writing to an automatic character array

2011-07-28 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49885 Summary: Segmentation fault when writing to an automatic character array Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Com

[Bug fortran/46705] New: Spurious "Missing '&' in continued character constant" warning occurs twice

2010-11-29 Thread mathewc at nag dot co.uk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 Summary: Spurious "Missing '&' in continued character constant" warning occurs twice Product: gcc Version: fortran-dev Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit