https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105510
--- Comment #6 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira ---
Also ran into this issue today, also involving compound literals in nested
structure initialization macros. Because clang accepts this, it compiled fine
on my development machine but failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694
--- Comment #4 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> Note that this isn't something GCC offers for other things, e.g. PR97119.
GCC does offer it for at least one thing that I'm aware of:
-e entry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694
--- Comment #2 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira ---
That's true but in that case the __stack_chk_* symbols will remain in the
compiler output and in the final binary. They will show up in readelf output,
GDB function disassemblies.
I think t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93509
--- Comment #3 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira ---
Equivalent feature request in the LLVM issue tracker:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/80236
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113694
Bug ID: 113694
Summary: Allow renaming stack smashing protector symbols
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93509
Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matheus.a.m.moreira at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112840
--- Comment #3 from Matheus Afonso Martins Moreira ---
(In reply to uecker from comment #2)
> I would go for a more generic feature where one can specify some invariant /
> condition that needs be true when a member of a struct / union is access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112840
Bug ID: 112840
Summary: feature request: warn on incorrect tagged union value
access
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
