https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70742
--- Comment #11 from Marcos Diaz ---
(In reply to Daniel Gutson from comment #10)
> (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #8)
> > "The div, ldiv, and lldiv functions return a structure of type div_t,
> > ldiv_t, and lldiv_t, respectively, compris
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976
--- Comment #10 from Marcos Diaz ---
Thanks for the test, we forgot to append some test too. It worked ok. if you
want you can apply that patch in gcc 5.2.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976
--- Comment #8 from Marcos Diaz ---
Created attachment 37971
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37971&action=edit
An implementation for x86 security_sensitive function attribute
Hi, we made this patch, that adds an attribute 's
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63301
--- Comment #2 from Marcos Diaz ---
Sorry, I expressed wrong the issue I was reporting, What I want to ask is the
following:
Is it ok that the wchar_t is a long int and the wint_t is just an int?
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: marcos.diaz at tallertechnologies dot com
Created attachment 33514
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33514&action=edit
Test to print wchar_t
At compil