[Bug tree-optimization/117062] [15 regression] x86-64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect

2024-10-10 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117062 --- Comment #5 from Manuel Lauss --- Another one: g++ -c -O2 -march=znver5 lra-constraints.ii during GIMPLE pass: forwprop /tmp-ram/portage/sys-devel/gcc-15.0./work/gcc-15.0./gcc/lra-constraints.cc: In function 'bool split_reg(bool, in

[Bug tree-optimization/117062] [15 regression] x86-64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect

2024-10-10 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117062 --- Comment #4 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > Could be a dup of bug 117050. As soon as Richard has a patch I'll restest.

[Bug debug/117062] [15 regression] x86-64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect

2024-10-10 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117062 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss --- The failing build step is: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -std=c++11 -fPIE -c-m64 -O3 -march=znver5 -mtune=znver5 -pipe -DIN_GCC-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-error=na

[Bug debug/117062] New: [15 regression] x86-64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect

2024-10-10 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117062 Bug ID: 117062 Summary: [15 regression] x86-64: ICE during GIMPLE pass: vect Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/116791] [15 Regression] ICE in operator[], at vec.h:910

2024-09-20 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Looks very recent as it worked at r15-3721-ga2746e43470 . > And it was reported against r15-3737-g33ccc1314dcdb0 . I suspect it's 4eba48a684 or 664e0ce5, becau

[Bug c/116791] New: ICE in operator[], at vec.h:910

2024-09-20 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116791 Bug ID: 116791 Summary: ICE in operator[], at vec.h:910 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assi

[Bug ipa/115942] [14/15 regression] lto1: ICE in record_argument_state, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:2122

2024-07-16 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115942 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/115942] [14/15 regression] lto1: ICE in record_argument_state, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:2122

2024-07-15 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115942 --- Comment #4 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The .o file for LTO is not good at all. > > Please attach the original preprocessed sources? > > See > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/ > A_guide_to_testcase_reduction

[Bug lto/115942] [14/15 regression] lto1: ICE in record_argument_state, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:2122

2024-07-15 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115942 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added Host||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Target|

[Bug lto/115942] New: [14/15 regression] lto1: ICE in record_argument_state, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:2122

2024-07-15 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115942 Bug ID: 115942 Summary: [14/15 regression] lto1: ICE in record_argument_state, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:2122 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/115751] [15 Regression] ICE building 521.wrf_r

2024-07-04 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115751 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com ---

[Bug target/115780] ICE during RTL pass: split1

2024-07-04 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115780 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/115780] ICE during RTL pass: split1

2024-07-04 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115780 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > I suspect this is a dup of bug 115751 . Yes I agree, looks very similar and appeared within the same timeframe.

[Bug c++/115780] New: ICE during RTL pass: split1

2024-07-04 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115780 Bug ID: 115780 Summary: ICE during RTL pass: split1 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assign

[Bug c++/115398] New: [15 regression] RTL flag check: CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P used with unexpected rtx code 'plus' in get_pool_constant, at varasm.cc:4046

2024-06-08 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115398 Bug ID: 115398 Summary: [15 regression] RTL flag check: CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P used with unexpected rtx code 'plus' in get_pool_constant, at varasm.cc:4046 Product: gcc

[Bug c/115009] New: [15 regression] AVR: ICE in alloc, at value-range-storage.cc:598

2024-05-09 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115009 Bug ID: 115009 Summary: [15 regression] AVR: ICE in alloc, at value-range-storage.cc:598 Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/113048] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1862 (unable to find a register to spill) {*andndi3_doubleword_bmi} with -march=cascadelake since r13

2024-01-05 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113048 --- Comment #6 from Manuel Lauss --- After be977db17c91ad6627dee70a1904a95d229aa1be I don't see this ICE any longer on either x64 or mips bootstrap.

[Bug target/113048] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1862 (unable to find a register to spill) {*andndi3_doubleword_bmi} with -march=cascadelake

2023-12-20 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113048 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com ---

[Bug target/112681] [14 Regression] ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 (unrecognizable insn) with -O2 -mfma -mno-sse4.2 and memcmp() since r14-5747

2023-11-23 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112681 --- Comment #7 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Created attachment 56676 [details] > gcc14-pr112681.patch > > Full untested patch. Fixes all ICEs I've seen today. Thank you!

[Bug target/112676] [14 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804

2023-11-23 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112676 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss --- I think PR112681 is the same issue.

[Bug target/112676] [14 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804

2023-11-23 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112676 --- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss --- Created attachment 56671 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=56671&action=edit another testcase Another testcase, one of a few from virtualbox: g++ -O2 -march=znver4 -mtune=znver4 -mno-avx

[Bug c/112676] New: [14 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804

2023-11-22 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112676 Bug ID: 112676 Summary: [14 regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2804 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug tree-optimization/112536] [14 regression] ICE when building xorg-server on arm64 (internal compiler error: in vect_slp_analyze_node_operations, at tree-vect-slp.cc:6378) since r14-5435-g7383cb56e

2023-11-15 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112536 --- Comment #10 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Created attachment 56591 [details] > gcc14-pr112536.patch > > Untested fix. It does fix the ICE I saw with mesa (avx512) Thanks!

[Bug c/111902] New: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

2023-10-20 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111902 Bug ID: 111902 Summary: internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug rtl-optimization/111142] [14 regression] ICE in get_group_load_store_type, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:2121 (AVX512)

2023-08-24 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42 --- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss --- This is fairly new, something after 4aa14ec7d5b25722e4d02c29c8c1e22dcc5a4915 ("MATCH: [PR09] Fix bit_ior(cond,cond) when comparisons are fp") may have caused this, since I was able to build mesa just 12 h

[Bug rtl-optimization/111142] New: [14 regression] ICE in get_group_load_store_type, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:2121 (AVX512)

2023-08-24 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42 Bug ID: 42 Summary: [14 regression] ICE in get_group_load_store_type, at tree-vect-stmts.cc:2121 (AVX512) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug middle-end/111082] ICE in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:214 (AVX512 related)

2023-08-20 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111082 --- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss --- Created attachment 55767 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55767&action=edit another compressed unreduced testcase Another testcase. it triggers with "-march=zvner1" but not e.g. "core2"

[Bug middle-end/111082] New: ICE in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:214 (AVX512 related)

2023-08-20 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111082 Bug ID: 111082 Summary: ICE in expand_fn_using_insn, at internal-fn.cc:214 (AVX512 related) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/110482] ICE tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6644

2023-06-29 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110482 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/110460] [14 Regression] ft32 ICE on 931110-1.c with new TYPE_PRECISION checking

2023-06-29 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110460 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com ---

[Bug c/110482] New: ICE tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6644

2023-06-29 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110482 Bug ID: 110482 Summary: ICE tree check: expected none of vector_type, have vector_type in type_has_mode_precision_p, at tree.h:6644 Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug c++/110296] New: ICE in gsi_replace, at gimple-iterator.cc:437 during GIMPLE pass: widening_mul

2023-06-17 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110296 Bug ID: 110296 Summary: ICE in gsi_replace, at gimple-iterator.cc:437 during GIMPLE pass: widening_mul Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug ipa/108110] [13 Regression] ice in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:700 with -std=c++14 -O3 -march=znver3 since r13-4685-g4834e9360f7bf4

2022-12-18 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108110 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com ---

[Bug c++/108096] New: [13 regression] libreoffice build failure #2

2022-12-14 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108096 Bug ID: 108096 Summary: [13 regression] libreoffice build failure #2 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/108071] [13 regression] Build failure in Libreoffice

2022-12-12 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) I get the same errors, but the whole file can be compiled without errors with gcc-12 (it needs to be preprocessed with gcc-12 as well), and with a gcc-13 checkout

[Bug c++/108071] New: 13 regression: Build failure in Libreoffice

2022-12-12 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108071 Bug ID: 108071 Summary: 13 regression: Build failure in Libreoffice Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug bootstrap/107059] [13 regression] bootstrap failure after r13-2887-gb04208895fed34

2022-09-28 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107059 --- Comment #27 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #24) > (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #22) > > Even with the fixincluded headers properly being used, the powerpc64le > > issue still applies becau

[Bug tree-optimization/103961] [12 Regression] gcc-12 apparently miscompiles libcap's cap_to_text() function since r12-6030-g422f9eb7011b76c1

2022-01-11 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103961 --- Comment #17 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Siddhesh Poyarekar from comment #16) > Should be fixed with that patch. May I close this or wait for confirmation > from the reporter? I can no longer reproduce the original issue.

[Bug c/103961] gcc-12 apparently miscompiles libcap's cap_to_text() function

2022-01-10 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103961 --- Comment #2 from Manuel Lauss --- Created attachment 52154 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52154&action=edit gcc-12.0 output

[Bug c/103961] gcc-12 apparently miscompiles libcap's cap_to_text() function

2022-01-10 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103961 --- Comment #1 from Manuel Lauss --- Created attachment 52153 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52153&action=edit gcc-11.3 output

[Bug c/103961] New: gcc-12 apparently miscompiles libcap's cap_to_text() function

2022-01-10 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103961 Bug ID: 103961 Summary: gcc-12 apparently miscompiles libcap's cap_to_text() function Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/103928] [12 Regression] ICE in get_insn_template, at final.c:2050

2022-01-06 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103928 --- Comment #13 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12) > (In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #10) > > So it was either fixed in trunk in the last 20 hours, or pgo build broke > > gcc, or "-mno-xop" fixed it. > > The

[Bug target/103928] [12 Regression] ICE in get_insn_template, at final.c:2050

2022-01-06 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103928 Manuel Lauss changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|WAITING

[Bug target/103928] [12 Regression] ICE in get_insn_template, at final.c:2050

2022-01-06 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103928 --- Comment #9 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6) > > Then you may be affected by PR103905 which is fixed on the current master. > > Please pull to tip of master branch. >

[Bug target/103928] [12 Regression] ICE in get_insn_template, at final.c:2050

2022-01-06 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103928 --- Comment #5 from Manuel Lauss --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4) > (In reply to Manuel Lauss from comment #3) > > You're right, I too can only reproduce it on the bdver4 machine itself, not > > on e.g. a Zen or Haswell host. I'll

[Bug target/103928] [12 Regression] ICE in get_insn_template, at final.c:2050

2022-01-06 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103928 --- Comment #3 from Manuel Lauss --- You're right, I too can only reproduce it on the bdver4 machine itself, not on e.g. a Zen or Haswell host. I'll rebuild gcc-12 on the bdver4 host again.

[Bug c/103928] New: [12] ICE in get_insn_template, at final.c:2050

2022-01-06 Thread manuel.lauss at googlemail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103928 Bug ID: 103928 Summary: [12] ICE in get_insn_template, at final.c:2050 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c