--- Comment #2 from m4341 at abc dot se 2009-02-03 15:50 ---
Notice that the test cases have been executed on a Pentium III computer with
dual 866MHz processors.
The 'depth' variable in the example code has been set to produce comfortable
execution times for the forementione
--- Comment #1 from m4341 at abc dot se 2009-02-03 15:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=17234)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17234&action=view)
Test cases for demonstrating performance impact.
The attached file contains code that is in it's current sta
type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: m4341 at abc dot se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39087
--- Comment #2 from m4341 at abc dot se 2005-11-14 19:18 ---
Created an attachment (id=10237)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10237&action=view)
Proposal for the initial split.
This is the initial split I did, and I must admit that it isn't thoroughly
t
--- Comment #2 from m4341 at abc dot se 2005-11-14 18:42 ---
This was detected by opening the whole set of Java files in Eclipse (and not
having any standard Java library at all selected). The close method stood out
as an error. since it was declared to throw an exception in the classes
Exception
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: m4341 at abc dot se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24834
with Java standard
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: m4341 at abc dot se
http
--- Comment #2 from m4341 at abc dot se 2005-11-13 11:32 ---
This is actually in use in the class gnu.gcj.tools.gcj_dbtool.Main.java, line
382.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20977
mponent: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: m4341 at abc dot se
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24832
