https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
--- Comment #6 from Mathieu Othacehe ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> > Is it then possible to have dwarf data on ARM in addition to the EABI
> > defined unwind section?
>
> I don't know, honesty, because I've not tried it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
--- Comment #4 from Mathieu Othacehe ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #3)
> The Arm unwind section tables are defined by the Arm EABI; they only provide
> enough data for call-based exceptions to be unwound. It is not the same as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
--- Comment #2 from Mathieu Othacehe ---
Created attachment 59808
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59808&action=edit
libunwind full log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
--- Comment #1 from Mathieu Othacehe ---
Created attachment 59807
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59807&action=edit
Remove the cantunwind flag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117941
Bug ID: 117941
Summary: Partial backtrace on C++ exception on ARM
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
