[Bug libstdc++/101203] Remove unnecessary empty check in std::function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101203 Toni Neubert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/106921] [11/12/13/14 Regression] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921 --- Comment #8 from Toni Neubert --- Hello, I just wanted to ask what the state of this bug is? I think that incorrectly compiled code should be much more important than anything else since any system can be affected without even knowing it.

[Bug c++/106921] [11/12/13 Regression] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code since r11-4987-g602c6cfc79ce4ae6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921 --- Comment #3 from Toni Neubert --- Any update on this? Which compiler flag triggers this bug exactly? Or is it a complex combination multiple?

[Bug c++/106921] New: [11/12.1] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106921 Bug ID: 106921 Summary: [11/12.1] -O1 and -fipa-icf -fpartial-inlining causes wrong code Product: gcc Version: 11.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/105060] New: [10/11] ICE with consteval function: internal compiler error: in cp_gimplify_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:14879 with keep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105060 Bug ID: 105060 Summary: [10/11] ICE with consteval function: internal compiler error: in cp_gimplify_expr, at cp/cp-gimplify.c:14879 with keep-inline-functions Product: gcc

[Bug libstdc++/101203] Remove unnecessary empty check in std::function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101203 --- Comment #3 from Toni Neubert --- Thank you Jonathan for your fast answer. To sad but the shared library issue seems valid. Can shared libraries exist is a freestanding environment (like a bare-metal microcontroller running without OS)? So t

[Bug libstdc++/101203] New: Remove unnecessary empty check in std::function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101203 Bug ID: 101203 Summary: Remove unnecessary empty check in std::function Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/97237] [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97237 Toni Neubert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/97610] New: [10/11] template argument deduction fails for function with defaulted lambda as non-type-template parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97610 Bug ID: 97610 Summary: [10/11] template argument deduction fails for function with defaulted lambda as non-type-template parameter Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCO

[Bug c++/97237] [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97237 --- Comment #4 from Toni Neubert --- This code seems to fail for the same reason: constexpr int get() { [[maybe_unused]] auto i = 1 << 32; return 0; } template constexpr int test() { return a; } constexpr int t1 = get(); constexpr

[Bug c++/97237] New: [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97237 Bug ID: 97237 Summary: [10/11 Regression] static_assert does not accept fpermissive code Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal