https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55522
--- Comment #16 from Andy Lutomirski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13)
> Patient: Doctor it hurts when I do this.
> Doctor: then don't do that and if you read the instructions I gave you I
> told you I would hurt this way.
I think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98997
--- Comment #4 from Andy Lutomirski ---
I should add: on brief inspection, that patch looks like an ABI break for
-fcf-protection=none
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98997
--- Comment #3 from Andy Lutomirski ---
What is -fcf-protection=stack actually supposed to do as compared to
-fcf-protection=none? Is it valid to run code compiled with
-fcf-protection=none with SHSTK enabled? If so, then I wonder why
-fcf-prot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98997
Bug ID: 98997
Summary: Linking mismatched -fcf-protection objects generates
incorrect code
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48877
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
