Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: lunow at math dot hu-berlin.de
The following Code triggers the crash (C++11 mode)
int x = 0;
int z;
int main() {
constexpr int& y = x;
[=] { z = y; }();
}
$ g++ gccbug.cpp -s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53783
Bug #: 53783
Summary: [4.8 Regression] lambda in lambda in template function
rejected
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53488
Daniel Lunow changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lunow at math dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53488
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Lunow 2012-06-24
14:30:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 27694
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27694
integral constant-expression not an integral constant-expression
This test case should compile, but i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53488
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Lunow 2012-06-24
14:21:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 27693
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27693
small test case
Just wanted to report the same bug with gcc 4.7.1.
I found out, that it occurs, if t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53741
Bug #: 53741
Summary: ICE on lambda calling static template member function
with explicit template argument specification
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53624
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Lunow 2012-06-10
04:49:29 UTC ---
Their is no requirement (in the c++11 standard) for function templates that
implies subsequent template parameters after a template parameter with default
template argument must also ha
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53624
Bug #: 53624
Summary: GCC rejects function local types in template function
with default template arguments
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53567
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Lunow 2012-06-03
19:55:11 UTC ---
Created attachment 27549
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27549
the real testcase
I accidently uploaded the wrong file, this is the correct file.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53567
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Lunow 2012-06-03
19:53:00 UTC ---
Created attachment 27548
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27548
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53567
Bug #: 53567
Summary: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered on missing
enum entry
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
11 matches
Mail list logo
