https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47781
Luke Shumaker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lukeshu at lukeshu dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119188
--- Comment #2 from Luke Shumaker ---
I appreciate the explanation. Does that make it any less of a bug? Should I
change the title to "x86 red-zone not taken into account by
-fcallgraph-info=su"?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119188
Bug ID: 119188
Summary: Incorrect -fcallgraph-info=su for leaf functions on
x86-64
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118814
--- Comment #4 from Luke Shumaker ---
This had the keyword `ice-on-valid-code` (added by Sam James); bug 109828 has
the keyword `ice-on-invalid-code`.
I could be mistaken, but I believe that the code here is valid (and that GCC 12
was erroneous
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118814
Bug ID: 118814
Summary: -Warray-bounds causes internal compiler error:
Segmentation fault during GIMPLE pass: vrp
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118212
Bug ID: 118212
Summary: False positive -Wstringop-truncation despite
[[gnu::nonstring]]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117469
--- Comment #5 from Luke Shumaker ---
Indeed. My mistake.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117469
Luke Shumaker changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lukeshu at lukeshu dot com
--- Comment