[Bug target/115794] gcc 15 (20240630 snapshot) ICEs while building gfortran while targeting rv64gcv_zvl256b

2024-07-06 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115794 --- Comment #2 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #1) > Please try to reduce it with cvise > (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GCC_ICE_reporting_guide). I'm trying to sort out few other issues, once I&

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

2024-07-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 --- Comment #10 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org --- Passing `-mstrict-align` to gcc-14 to build gcc-14 does not seem to have effect, same Bus error triggered.

[Bug c++/115794] New: gcc 15 (20240630 snapshot) ICEs while building gfortran while targeting rv64gcv_zvl256b

2024-07-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org via Gcc-bugs
Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: lu_zero at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 58594 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58594&action=edit -freport

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

2024-07-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 --- Comment #8 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #4) > Should we backport -mvector-strict-align to release branches then? Arguably > this is not a bug fix (for the compiler) but x86 (and maybe others

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

2024-07-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 --- Comment #7 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3) > Thanks. Unfortunately GDB isn't dumping the vector regs, but I can make a > pretty good guess that this is an unaligned me

[Bug target/115789] gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

2024-07-04 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115789 --- Comment #2 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #1) > If you still have the system, knowing the value of the registers at this > point would be helpful. "info all-r" in gdb wou

[Bug c++/115789] New: gcc miscompile itself with CFLAGS -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b

2024-07-04 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org via Gcc-bugs
Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: lu_zero at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- while building with the produced compiler `gcc -O3 -march=rv64gcv_zvl256b conftest.c` the following sources ``` #include int main (void

[Bug c/80376] New: Some vec_xxpermdi usage lead to ICE

2017-04-09 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: lu_zero at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Testcase: #include #include int main(void) { vector unsigned int a = { 1, 2, 3, 4 }; vector unsigned int b = { -1, -2, -3, -4 }; unsigned int c[4], i, j; for (j = 0; j < 4

[Bug target/78084] gcc miscompiles vec_vsx_ld on -O3

2016-10-24 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78084 --- Comment #3 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org --- gcc-6.2 is fine as well.

[Bug driver/78084] New: gcc miscompiles vec_vsx_ld on -O3

2016-10-23 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: lu_zero at gentoo dot org Target Milestone: --- Host: powerpc64le-linux-gnu Target: powerpc64le-linux-gnu Created attachment 39872 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39872&acti

[Bug c/56648] New: ignored by target warning not triggered by -fpic but by -fPIC

2013-03-18 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56648 Bug #: 56648 Summary: ignored by target warning not triggered by -fpic but by -fPIC Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug c/55976] New: -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function

2013-01-14 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55976 Bug #: 55976 Summary: -Werror=return-type should error on returning a value from a void function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 St

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-31 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #11 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-31 11:02:44 UTC --- I'm trying to convince the original author to interact directly, otherwise I'll foster them myself in a bit. Thanks for the hint meanwhile

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #8 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-25 20:20:59 UTC --- Created attachment 29051 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29051 x86 linker support

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #7 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-25 20:19:11 UTC --- Created attachment 29050 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29050 powerpc linker support

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #6 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-25 20:18:38 UTC --- Created attachment 29049 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29049 microblaze linker support

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #5 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-25 20:17:56 UTC --- Created attachment 29048 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29048 mips linker support

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #4 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-25 20:17:24 UTC --- Created attachment 29047 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29047 arm linker support

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #3 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-25 20:15:57 UTC --- Created attachment 29046 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29046 Fix gomp assumption

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #2 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-25 20:14:57 UTC --- Created attachment 29045 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29045 C++ missing bits

[Bug bootstrap/55807] Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 --- Comment #1 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2012-12-25 20:14:15 UTC --- Created attachment 29044 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29044 gcc configuration

[Bug bootstrap/55807] New: Support musl libc

2012-12-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55807 Bug #: 55807 Summary: Support musl libc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 URL: https://bitbucket.org/GregorR/musl-gcc-patches/ Status: UN

[Bug middle-end/32667] builtin operator= generates memcpy with overlapping memory regions

2011-12-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667 lu_zero at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lu_zero at gentoo dot org

[Bug c++/39480] generated memcpy causes trouble in assignment

2011-12-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39480 lu_zero at gentoo dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lu_zero at gentoo dot org

[Bug c/33872] Segfault on -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mabi=altivec with gcc-4.3.0 from 20071012

2007-10-23 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #1 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2007-10-23 18:02 --- Created an attachment (id=14401) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14401&action=view) Minimalized testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33872

[Bug c/33872] New: Segfault on -O2 -ftree-vectorize -mabi=altivec with gcc-4.3.0 from 20071012

2007-10-23 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lu_zero at gentoo dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33872

[Bug driver/26686] ../../../gcc/libgfortran/mk-kinds-h.sh: Unknown type

2006-05-25 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Comment #3 from lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2006-05-25 14:54 --- same happens on ppc with gcc-4.1.1 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26686

[Bug target/18583] [3.4 Regression] error on valid code: const __attribute__((altivec(vector__))) doesn't work in arrays

2004-11-20 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-11-20 22:09 --- Created an attachment (id=7573) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7573&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18583

[Bug c/18583] New: error on valid code: const __attribute__((altivec(vector__))) doesn't work in arrays

2004-11-20 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
rtedBy: lu_zero at gentoo dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18583

[Bug target/18309] ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

2004-11-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-11-05 15:49 --- seems -m64 is causing the issue. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18309

[Bug c/18309] ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

2004-11-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-11-05 15:35 --- Created an attachment (id=7480) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7480&action=view) clean source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18309

[Bug c/18309] ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

2004-11-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-11-05 15:34 --- Created an attachment (id=7479) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7479&action=view) preprocessed sources -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18309

[Bug c/18309] New: ICE on valid code in print_operand_address, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:9678 (procps-3.2.4)

2004-11-05 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
t org ReportedBy: lu_zero at gentoo dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18309

[Bug c/18096] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2429

2004-10-21 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-10-21 08:46 --- Created an attachment (id=7395) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7395&action=view) sources -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18096

[Bug c/18096] internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2429

2004-10-21 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-10-21 08:41 --- Created an attachment (id=7394) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7394&action=view) preprocessed sources -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18096

[Bug c/18096] New: internal compiler error: in final_scan_insn, at final.c:2429

2004-10-21 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
NCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lu_zero at gentoo dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: powerpc-unknown

[Bug rtl-optimization/14110] altivec code misoptimized with any -O

2004-10-11 Thread lu_zero at gentoo dot org
--- Additional Comments From lu_zero at gentoo dot org 2004-10-11 17:16 --- Fixed at least on gcc-3.4.x and in the hammer branch. gcc-3.3.4 should have other problems (I didn't check yet) the best way to check about the problem works is just use mplayer or ffplay... --