[Bug target/36861] [4.3/4.4 Regression] boost's compressed avl confuses GCC

--- Comment #25 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-10-10 15:58 --- I was running the code on my Lenovo T61 Laptop: $ cat /proc/cpuinfo processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7700

[Bug tree-optimization/36861] [4.3 Regression] boost's compressed avl confuses GCC

--- Comment #20 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-31 02:01 --- With all the supplied test cases and data, why is it so hard to move the bug out of the UNCONFIRMED state. It should be fairly easy to confirm that it is a problem by running the attached test. -- http

[Bug tree-optimization/36861] [4.3 Regression] boost's compressed avl confuses GCC

--- Comment #19 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-28 18:55 --- Created an attachment (id=15973) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15973&action=view) oprofile logs I compiled optimized executables with and without -fno-strict-aliasing and generated an o

[Bug tree-optimization/36861] boost's compressed avl confuses GCC

--- Comment #15 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-22 22:01 --- What I am worried about is that if it is not marked as a regression nobody cares to fix it although it breaks a real application that works with gcc 4.3.2. If you have any insights how to improve the boost intrusive

[Bug tree-optimization/36861] boost's compressed avl confuses GCC

--- Comment #13 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-22 21:48 --- (In reply to comment #11) >From an application perspective it is still a regression, as it works happily with gcc 4.2.3 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861

[Bug tree-optimization/36861] [4.3 Regression] code generation regression with -O3

--- Comment #9 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-17 20:15 --- in reply to #7: Does this mean the status is no longer UNCONFIRMED? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861

[Bug tree-optimization/36861] code generation regression with -O3

--- Comment #8 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-17 18:09 --- If you have questions about the internal implementation of the boost avl tree you can contact Ion Gaztañaga igaztanaga at gmail dot com. He is aware of this problem already. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug tree-optimization/36861] code generation regression with -O3

--- Comment #6 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-17 17:52 --- in reply to #4: -fno-tree-vectorize does not help $ /opt2/linux/ix86/bin/g++-4.3.1 -m64 -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize -g -save-temps -I/opt2/linux/x86_64/include/boost-1_35 -DUSE_OPTIMIZATION=0 -o ./avltest-no

[Bug tree-optimization/36861] code generation regression with -O3

--- Comment #5 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-17 17:50 --- Created an attachment (id=15924) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15924&action=view) the preprocessed file for case that is slower -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861

[Bug c++/36861] code generation regression with -O3

--- Comment #2 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-17 16:54 --- Created an attachment (id=15923) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15923&action=view) updated testcase changed the test case to resemble my application a bit closer. Here it is almost 4

[Bug c++/36861] code generation regression with -O3

--- Comment #1 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2008-07-17 07:28 --- Created an attachment (id=15921) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15921&action=view) test case to reproduce the problem -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861

[Bug c++/36861] New: code generation regression with -O3

nassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lothar at tradescape dot biz GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36861

[Bug gcov/profile/25351] Segmentation fault in function coverage_checksum_string

--- Comment #5 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2006-03-24 18:45 --- We also get ICEs on valid code with gcc 4.1.0 on both i686 and x86_64 both on Linux if we compile our source with -fprofile-arcs -ftest-coverage. When I tried to produce a precompiled (-E) file I could NOT reproduce

[Bug c++/24272] strange link error with ACE

--- Comment #2 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2005-10-08 06:07 --- /opt2/linux/ix86/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/g++ -fvisibility=hidden -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -save-temps -W -Wall -Wpointer-arith -m64 -I/opt2/linux/x86_64/include -O3 -g -pipe -m64 -I/opt2/linux/x86_64/include

[Bug c++/24272] strange link error with ACE

--- Comment #1 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2005-10-08 06:06 --- Created an attachment (id=9932) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9932&action=view) preprocessed file (gziped) preprocessed file that is mentioned in the linker error as having created the

[Bug c++/24272] New: strange link error with ACE

t status -- Summary: strange link error with ACE Product: gcc Version: 4.0.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lothar at trades

[Bug c++/24271] ServicesC.h:45: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

--- Comment #1 from lothar at tradescape dot biz 2005-10-08 05:59 --- Created an attachment (id=9931) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9931&action=view) preprocessed file -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24271

[Bug c++/24271] New: ServicesC.h:45: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

MED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lothar at tradescape dot biz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24271