[Bug c++/119153] Static storage for initializer_list no longer shares with array literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119153 --- Comment #2 from Zhihao Yuan --- Regression or not, if -fmerge-all-constants is acceptable, P2752 wouldn't exist: https://godbolt.org/z/TTfbj7jjE

[Bug c++/119153] New: [14 Regression] Static storage for initializer_list no longer shares with array literals

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119153 Bug ID: 119153 Summary: [14 Regression] Static storage for initializer_list no longer shares with array literals Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/108290] New: QoI: bind_front captureless lambda is too big

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108290 Bug ID: 108290 Summary: QoI: bind_front captureless lambda is too big Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c+

[Bug c++/71954] template partial specialization for constexpr error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71954 Zhihao Yuan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lichray at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug c++/97198] __is_constructible(int[], int) should return true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97198 --- Comment #8 from Zhihao Yuan --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > (In reply to Zhihao Yuan from comment #5) > > Encountered this today. In case I cannot show up when discussing LWG3486, my > > use case is that C(in_place_type, a

[Bug c++/97198] __is_constructible(int[], int) should return true

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97198 Zhihao Yuan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lichray at gmail dot com --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug c++/104653] New: Derived class looks for a definition of its inherited constexpr virtual destructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104653 Bug ID: 104653 Summary: Derived class looks for a definition of its inherited constexpr virtual destructor Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever