[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #21 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #15) > If you can reproduce, could you please attach preprocessed source? > So that it can be bisected if it is indeed a 15 regression (then it might be > a

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #19 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61140 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61140&action=edit dump part3

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #18 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61139 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61139&action=edit dump part2

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #17 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 61138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61138&action=edit dump part1

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #14 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #12) > Unfortunately I can't reproduce it yet. Could you show me `gcc -v`? > (Wondering what --with-arch= is, especially, if anything.) [alma8 build]$ fl_gcc -v

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #9 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > (In reply to lfoldy from comment #7) > > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > > > Created attachment 61136 [details] > > > gcc15-pr119834.patch

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #7 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > Created attachment 61136 [details] > gcc15-pr119834.patch > > Untested patch (except on a short testcase with memset (ptr, 0, 17); to > verify that *cl

[Bug target/119834] [15 regression] Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 --- Comment #5 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Sam James from comment #2) > Can you show the full command line at least please? Need the flags. fl_gxx -Isrc/libharfbuzz-subset.so.0.61101.0.p -Isrc -I../harfbuzz-11.0.1/src -I. -I../

[Bug target/119834] New: Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119834 Bug ID: 119834 Summary: Compiling harfbuzz 11.0.1 with gcc 15 20250413 fails on s390x Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/115178] false positive computed goto jump warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115178 --- Comment #4 from lfoldy at gmail dot com --- Thanks. Unfortunately, it's a threading interpreter and the labels can not be made local.

[Bug libgcc/117674] New: PPC unwind: comparison between pointer and integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117674 Bug ID: 117674 Summary: PPC unwind: comparison between pointer and integer Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo