[Bug sanitizer/89298] Address-Sanitizer false positive for global-buffer-overflow?

2019-02-12 Thread lee_shao at 126 dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89298 --- Comment #3 from Keerecles --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > It is not clear how that can compile, because both > unsigned int g_var =0; > and > extern unsigned int g_var =0; > are g_var definitions, so if that is in multiple T

[Bug sanitizer/89298] New: Address-Sanitizer false positive for global-buffer-overflow?

2019-02-12 Thread lee_shao at 126 dot com
Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: lee_shao at 126 dot com CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org, marxin at gcc dot