https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91191
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yea, I think so -- which would be undefined because the sizes are different
according to the docs you referenced. Which would also invalidate part of my
responses in c#5 and c#7.
It sounds like something o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #57 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Below is a POC for improving the uninit analysis to handle this kind of case.
It's not complete. In particular it does not ensure that the we have the same
result on the RHS and LHS of the V_C_E. Basical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87489
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |law at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86010
--- Comment #14 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I believe it's still an issue for gcc-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92539
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
I wonder if we're looking at this the wrong way.
We have several blocks with this kind of structure:
[local count: 30530247]:
if (last_12 != &MEM [(void *)"aa" + 3B])
goto ; [54.59%]
else
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98594
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Duh. I should have seen the reinterpret_cast as a red flag on this one. And
not surprising -fno-strict-aliasing makes the glm testsuite happy. Sorry for
the noise.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96015
--- Comment #38 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
sparc might be able to trip this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98465
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #10 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98594
Bug ID: 98594
Summary: [11 Regression] IPA modref codegen bug
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95663
--- Comment #18 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Jon, there's no way for the optimizers to improve the to_derived_bad case as
there's nothing in the IL after we leave the front-end that's useful. In the
.original dump we have:
;; Function derived& to_de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98585
Bug ID: 98585
Summary: [11 Regression] target attribute resets cmodel on x86
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
--- Comment #12 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
On 12/30/20 10:30 AM, glaubitz at physik dot fu-berlin.de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
>
> --- Comment #11 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz fu-berlin.de> ---
> (In reply to Jef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95381
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So if that bisection is accurate, the only way this could be failing would be
if something with a deprecated attribute is being used.
Maybe some printfs in warn_deprecated_use? But again, I'm a bit surpri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91191
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
If you're V_C_E-ing to a narrower type, you just ignore the bits outside the
target type, it's a lot like a narrowing subreg in the RTL world.
I don't know what the semantics are for the widening case. IST
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91191
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
The best way to think about V_C_E is that it's the same bits, just viewed in a
different type whereas a cast can do things like sign/zero extension,
truncation of floating point values to integers, etc).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 96708, which changed state.
Bug 96708 Summary: Failure to optimize max pattern with comparison when using a
temporary variable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96708
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96708
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 96679, which changed state.
Bug 96679 Summary: Failure to optimize or+and+or pattern to and+or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96679
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96679
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97928
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-23
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80635
--- Comment #55 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So to summarize some thoughts from Richi from last year.
Converting the V_C_E into a NOP_EXPR is undesirable as the truncation becomes
sub-optimal because we end up with an additional masking operation. S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91318
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89180
Bug 89180 depends on bug 91318, which changed state.
Bug 91318 Summary: [C++][PATCH] warnings about unused internal macros with
-Wunused-macros and #pragma GCC optimize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91318
What|Remov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86674
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Created attachment 49550
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49550&action=edit
Testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97804
Bug ID: 97804
Summary: ICE in output_constructor_register_field
varasm.c:5407
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97108
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Statu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96948
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91489
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 96701, which changed state.
Bug 96701 Summary: Failure to optimize self right-shift to 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96701
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96701
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Resolutio
32 matches
Mail list logo
