[Bug tree-optimization/17863] [4.0 Regression] threefold performance loss, not inlining as much

2005-02-25 Thread kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de
--- Additional Comments From kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de 2005-02-25 09:52 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] threefold performance loss, not inlining as much Wow. Many thanks for that analysis. Now I will go and fetch the patch. Since nobody seems to care about improving

[Bug tree-optimization/17863] [4.0 Regression] threefold performance loss, not inlining as much

2005-02-08 Thread kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de
--- Additional Comments From kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de 2005-02-08 10:13 --- Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] threefold performance loss, not inlining as much Good idea. However, this provides just another knob to tune the inlining and it is not obvious where to apply that

[Bug libstdc++/19562] New: reverse_iterator comparison

2005-01-21 Thread kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC

[Bug c++/18610] New: bad error message

2004-11-22 Thread kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de
t org ReportedBy: kunert at physik dot tu-dresden dot de CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18610