[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

2015-09-01 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 --- Comment #11 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- > Does this mean that this PR can be closed? If yes, with which resolution? It is still unresolved. The commited patch requires pr64271 and pr67424 to be resolved first. I no longer run NetBSD and quite

[Bug libgcc/61309] cilk-plus tests fail with: hidden symbol `__cpu_model' in /x/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../libgcc.a(cpuinfo.o) is referenced by DSO

2015-02-09 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309 --- Comment #3 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- Hello John, > FYI, this is still happening. > So if/when DragonFly features libgcc_s from 5.0 in base, these errors will go > away? To be honest I am not quite sure, but I think it is not the presence of

[Bug target/39570] cabs and cabsf are named differently on NetBSD 5

2014-12-17 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39570 Kai-Uwe Eckhardt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kuehro at gmx dot de --- Comment #12

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 --- Comment #10 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- > And please CC libstd...@gcc.gnu.org for the three libstdc++ patches. Done.

[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 --- Comment #9 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- I have submitted the necessary patches and test_result.log as #64271

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 --- Comment #6 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- Created attachment 34259 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34259&action=edit test_summary All gfortran tests fail to run due to bug #39570

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 --- Comment #4 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- Created attachment 34257 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34257&action=edit libcilkrts-thread cilk uses a non-posix function

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 --- Comment #5 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- Created attachment 34258 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34258&action=edit libgfortran-weak

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 --- Comment #3 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- Created attachment 34256 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34256&action=edit libcilkrts1

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 --- Comment #2 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- Created attachment 34255 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34255&action=edit libstdc++-patch3

[Bug bootstrap/64271] Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64271 --- Comment #1 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- Created attachment 34254 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34254&action=edit libstdc++-patch2

[Bug bootstrap/64271] New: Minimal patches to bootstrap on NetBSD

2014-12-11 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kuehro at gmx dot de Created attachment 34253 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34253&action=edit libstdc++-patch1 Bootstrap of 5.0 fails on NetBSD, but with the patches in NetBSD's package syst

[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

2014-12-07 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 --- Comment #8 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- I found out the minimal set of patches to bootstrap. I will open a bug report after running the testsuite.

[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

2014-12-06 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 --- Comment #6 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- > --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Any progress? Gerald Pfeifer offered to help, but somehow it slipped through. The patch still works for the latest 5.0 snapshot 20141130: > Hi Kai-Uwe,

[Bug libgcc/61309] cilk-plus tests fail with: hidden symbol `__cpu_model' in /x/gcc/testsuite/g++/../../libgcc.a(cpuinfo.o) is referenced by DSO

2014-05-29 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61309 Kai-Uwe Eckhardt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kuehro at gmx dot de --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

2013-07-03 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 --- Comment #4 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt --- I have updated the patch for snapshot 4.9-20130630. If Gerald Pfeifer agrees to create a copy of freebsd-stdint.h and to keep the copyright line as is, then this could be done easily by someone with commit

[Bug fortran/48244] iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

2013-07-03 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 Kai-Uwe Eckhardt changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23752|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug fortran/48244] New: iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch)

2011-03-22 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244 Summary: iso-c-binding support missing on NetBSD (with patch) Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assigne

[Bug libfortran/47830] errors in intrinsics/c99_functions.c

2011-02-21 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47830 --- Comment #2 from Kai-Uwe Eckhardt 2011-02-21 10:38:16 UTC --- Hi, > > There are two errors > > For those having - like me - problems to spot the second error: > > > static long double prechalf = nexafterl (0.5L, LDBL_MAX); > >

[Bug libfortran/47830] New: errors in intrinsics/c99_functions.c

2011-02-20 Thread kuehro at gmx dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47830 Summary: errors in intrinsics/c99_functions.c Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libfortran AssignedTo: unassi