--- Comment #25 from kspiteri at ieee dot org 2006-06-15 06:25 ---
In reply to comment #24:
> No it should not be. a() is a temporary so it cannot be bound to "a&". At
> least it should not be.
Then this is not a bug. The C++ standard in 27.6.2.1 defines
* bas
--- Comment #23 from kspiteri at ieee dot org 2006-06-14 15:28 ---
The test case in attachment 11669 shows that this bug has nothing to do with
ostreams. The output from the test case should be:
char
char
Instead, the output is:
char
void
--
kspiteri at ieee dot org changed
--- Comment #22 from kspiteri at ieee dot org 2006-06-14 15:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=11669)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11669&action=view)
Minimal test case.
Test case showing bug is independant of ostreams.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
