https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
--- Comment #16 from Matthew Krafczyk ---
I've just checked this bug again with ubuntu 14.10. This is with glibc 2.19,
and with the master branch of gcc (commit
3c4e189973c43b7f3c2ebb27abf32e9cb175ba82).
The first fragment succeeds, but the seco
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
--- Comment #15 from Matthew Krafczyk ---
I can now confirm what siddhesh says. with 4.8 the first fragment succeeds,
while the second fails.
I also tested the git gcc and git glibc, and the first fragment succeeds, while
the second fragment stil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27557
Matthew Krafczyk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krafczyk.matthew at gmail dot
com
