--- Comment #6 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2008-01-23 10:43 ---
Give back.
--
konqueror at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|konqueror at gmx
ssigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: konqueror at gmx dot de
GCC build triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28086
--- Comment #21 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-05-26 14:58 ---
Can this please get backportet to the 4.1 branch? This bug is still holding
back some Java stuff on Debian/ia64 from being working.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483
--- Comment #4 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-05-25 08:50 ---
This is a Debian problem, not an upstream problem. You missed to install the
build-essesntial package in debian. That would have installed all needd stuff
for you. Closing as invalid.
--
konqueror at gmx dot de changed
--- Comment #2 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-05-13 17:27 ---
I tried with -O0 and -O1. The bug doesnt happen with -O0 but with -O1 and -O2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27590
--- Comment #1 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-05-13 17:22 ---
$ gcj-4.1 -v
Using built-in specs.
Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc/i486-linux-gnu/4.1.1/../../../libgcj.spec
rename spec lib to liborig
Target: i486-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --enable-languages=c,c
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: konqueror at gmx dot de
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27590
--- Comment #1 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-03-11 07:03 ---
I can confirm the same bug for GCJ 4.1 branch with backported GNU
crypto stuff.
--
konqueror at gmx dot de changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-27 17:26 ---
I dont think so as the testcase works correctly on amd64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483
--- Comment #1 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-27 16:20 ---
Created an attachment (id=10921)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10921&action=view)
Testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483
ReportedBy: konqueror at gmx dot de
GCC build triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26483
--- Comment #1 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-10 08:29 ---
Subject: Re: New: Regex bug "++"
Works fine with jamvm 1.4.2 and current GNU classpath CVS.
Porting this fix to 4.1 branchshould be done.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26202
--- Comment #5 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-08 17:49 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 only] Exception when compiling valid regex pattern
No, this is no regression. Java is not release critical to GCC so we
should just fix this bug as we fix many other bugs too. Not just
regressions
--- Comment #1 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-08 17:11 ---
Subject: Re: New: Exception when compiling valid regex pattern
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 05:03:48PM -, green at redhat dot com wrote:
> The azureus developers identified a regex failure that is causing trou
--- Comment #3 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-07 12:05 ---
Subject: Re: gtkImage.c complains and crashes the application
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:55:10AM -, cardona at ucla dot edu wrote:
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from cardona at ucla dot edu 2006-02
--- Comment #1 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-07 11:23 ---
Subject: Re: New: gtkImage.c complains and crashes the application
On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 11:10:20AM -, cardona at ucla dot edu wrote:
> ImageJ, the public domain scientific-grade image processing applicat
--- Comment #1 from konqueror at gmx dot de 2006-02-05 13:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=10781)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10781&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26103
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: konqueror at gmx dot de
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-06-03 06:14
---
What if people wanna access some gnu.* stuff we ship directly, like
gnu.regexp?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21892
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-04-27 07:17
---
Created an attachment (id=8749)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8749&action=view)
testcase
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21245
iority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: konqueror at gmx dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i68
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-04-25 09:50
---
As you can see at
http://developer.classpath.org/compare/classpath-libgcj/libgcj-classpath-compare.html
this class is merged. This page is updated twice a day so pretty uptodate
normally.
--
http
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |konqueror at gmx dot de
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-04-21 05:28
---
This bug is fixed in GNU classpath and I will merge the needed fixes soon.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: AWT
AssignedTo: fitzsim at redhat dot com
ReportedBy: konqueror at gmx dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-03-09 18:40
---
Upstream is the provider of your jdbc provider. DB/2 in your case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20394
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-03-09 17:47
---
Thats a bug in upstream, the jdbc connector/application here. No application
should access sun classes. File a bug against them. Even SUN says: Don't use
them directly. We did the same successfully for a bun
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-03-04 07:45
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] libgcj configured with --enable-gtk-cairo fails
on installation
On Thu, Mar 03, 2005 at 10:38:55PM -, doko at debian dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments Fro
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-15 22:36
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-15 22:30
---
I'm working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-15 22:30
---
I'm working on it
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-15 08:34
---
All mauve testcase regarding java.text.CollationElementIterator pass now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9613
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-14 20:50
---
I'm working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-13 11:38
---
A patch can be found here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java-patches/2005-q1/msg00077.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17784
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-07 22:43
---
I'm working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-07 22:43
---
I'm working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-07 22:42
---
I'm working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-07 22:42
---
I'm working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-07 22:41
---
I'm working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2005-01-07 22:40
---
I'm working on it
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc do
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-12-07 13:55
---
Created an attachment (id=7699)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7699&action=view)
Testcase compile by jikes 1.22
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18868
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-12-07 13:24
---
The bug only occurs when compiling the testcase with jikes (1.22) and not when
compiling gcj (3.4.2 or 4.0.0).
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Known to fail||3.3.4 3.
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: konqueror at gmx dot de
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
--
Bug 16229 depends on bug 14009, which changed state.
Bug 14009 Summary: libgcj HttpURLConnection does not handle situation where retrieving
url without trailing slash after domain.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14009
What|Old Value |New Value
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-10-22 20:35 ---
Bug fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-10-22 20:30 ---
he patch got rewritten from scratch due to copyright assignment issues with
the patch attached to the bug report.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14009
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-10-22 20:03 ---
Confirmed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-10-22 20:03 ---
Confirmed
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-10-20 20:36 ---
Please put native code into VMAccessController from start if possible.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13604
--- Additional Comments From konqueror at gmx dot de 2004-09-30 15:46 ---
You need to unzip the jar in a directory and then try to compile the jar in
there (the jar, not the class files directly).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17733
51 matches
Mail list logo
