[Bug libstdc++/111685] Segfault while sorting on array element address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685 Kyle Knoepfel changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/111685] Segfault while sorting on array element address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685 Kyle Knoepfel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug libstdc++/111685] Segfault while sorting on array element address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685 --- Comment #3 from Kyle Knoepfel --- @Andrew Pinski, yes I surmised as much. My difficulty, though, is in understanding if this is the correct behavior according to the standard's specification of std::sort, which presumably is reasonably summ

[Bug c++/111685] New: Segfault while sorting on array element address

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111685 Bug ID: 111685 Summary: Segfault while sorting on array element address Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component