[Bug fortran/59024] New: ICE: after printing certain error messages, the compiler seg faults.

2013-11-06 Thread kimwooyoung at gmail dot com
Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kimwooyoung at gmail dot com This reproducer causes the compiler to seg fault. The compiler exits normally with the commented-out version. The reproducer is not a legal fortran

[Bug fortran/58906] New: SELECT TYPE with CLASS IS generates ICE

2013-10-28 Thread kimwooyoung at gmail dot com
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kimwooyoung at gmail dot com The code fragment causes gfortan to die with a seg fault. Using 'TYPE IS' instead of 'CLASS IS' seems o.k. MODULE mymod TYPE base CONTAINS END TYPE base TYPE, EX

[Bug fortran/58904] New: ICE: accessing a component field of an unavailable type results in a seg fault

2013-10-28 Thread kimwooyoung at gmail dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: kimwooyoung at gmail dot com The following code causes gfortran 4.8.2 to die with a seg fault. (Ubuntu 12.10, intel64 (i.e., 64-bit x86) ) MODULE mymod CONTAINS TYPE

[Bug c++/35396] possible incorrect opitmization due to missed dependency

2008-02-27 Thread kimwooyoung at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from kimwooyoung at gmail dot com 2008-02-28 06:35 --- Created an attachment (id=15240) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15240&action=view) a test file to re-produce the issue to reproduce the issue, compile it with 'g++ -O2 &#

[Bug c++/35396] New: possible incorrect opitmization due to missed dependency

2008-02-27 Thread kimwooyoung at gmail dot com
letes. -- Summary: possible incorrect opitmization due to missed dependency Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kimwooyoung at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35396