[Bug debug/24490] [4.1 Regression] gcc / gdb backtrace problem

2005-11-01 Thread kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au
--- Comment #7 from kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au 2005-11-01 23:55 --- I've just had a look at gdb PR 2024 and disagree with the comment "backtrace fails when function ends with call to abort". The following code also ehibits the problem noted here. =

[Bug debug/24490] [4.1 Regression] gcc / gdb backtrace problem

2005-10-23 Thread kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au
--- Comment #3 from kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au 2005-10-23 22:13 --- Just for the record, I've pasted the incorrect gdb output for the second backtrace. It is as follows: #0 0x00240402 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x00726118 in raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x007278

[Bug c/24490] New: gcc / gdb backtrace problem

2005-10-22 Thread kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au
base for "main".) at test.c:4 -- Summary: gcc / gdb backtrace problem Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug c++/24172] New: error: incorrect sharing of tree nodes

2005-10-02 Thread kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au
cc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24172

[Bug c++/19317] [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-09-29 Thread kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au
--- Additional Comments From kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au 2005-09-30 01:59 --- A discussion on another mailing list revealed the page http://lists.kde.org/?l=kde-devel&m=112537321024777&w=2 where it states that the bug is in libstdc++ and can be overcome by set

[Bug c++/19317] [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-09-27 Thread kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au
--- Additional Comments From kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au 2005-09-27 07:28 --- All three testcases compile & run ok. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19317

[Bug c++/19317] [4.1 Regression] removing a temporary return value when we cannot

2005-09-26 Thread kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au
--- Additional Comments From kev dot gilbert at cdu dot edu dot au 2005-09-26 23:17 --- Whilst this bug has been marked as resolved, I am still experiencing the same problems (with arts-1.4.91 - the version shipped with KDE 35. Beta 1). My gcc version info : gcc (GCC) 4.1.0