https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120896
Bug ID: 120896
Summary: __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ incorrect behavior (depends on
instanciation order)
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119212
--- Comment #8 from Nikl Kelbon ---
In commit 3dbf070f50c5d47537019fc7f2cbbdfd43bad5ed i added flag for you
diff:
https://github.com/bot-motherlib/TGBM/pull/111/commits/3dbf070f50c5d47537019fc7f2cbbdfd43bad5ed
steps to reproduce:
- git clone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119212
--- Comment #5 from Nikl Kelbon ---
I've done a lot of work to make this project build and run with minimal effort,
without the hassle of installing dependencies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119212
--- Comment #2 from Nikl Kelbon ---
I understand, sorry for not preparing a bug report. I have a lot of work, you
could download the project and run it yourself using CMake
include(FetchContent)
FetchContent_Declare(
TGBM
GIT_REPOSITORY ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119212
Bug ID: 119212
Summary: Unstable internal compiler error, possibly
miscompilation with coroutines
Product: gcc
Version: 12.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119141
--- Comment #8 from Nikl Kelbon ---
I saw example, yes, its unclear what standard means here. May be this lines was
written with something interesting in mind, such as 'duration is not just
integer under templates', instead may be some overflow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119141
--- Comment #5 from Nikl Kelbon ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> (In reply to Nikl Kelbon from comment #2)
> > This is not a bug about the difference in behavior of different compilers.
> > Of course they will behave the same, they
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119141
--- Comment #2 from Nikl Kelbon ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> ```
> #include
> #include
>
> [[gnu::noinline,gnu::noipa]]
> void sink(auto)
> {}
>
> int main() {
> std::chrono::milliseconds ms = std::chrono::millisecon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119141
--- Comment #4 from Nikl Kelbon ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> (In reply to Nikl Kelbon from comment #2)
> > This is not a bug about the difference in behavior of different compilers.
> > Of course they will behave the same, they
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119141
Bug ID: 119141
Summary: ub sanitizer incorrect overflow detection
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
--- Comment #3 from Nikl Kelbon ---
Note: its preprocessed sources for another bug with placement new / RVO in
coroutines, i dont know how it placed in my old issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
--- Comment #2 from Nikl Kelbon ---
There are preprocessed sources
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/pull/105#issuecomment-2493465483
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117736
Bug ID: 117736
Summary: Internal error checking coroutine final suspend self
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116987
Bug ID: 116987
Summary: Internal error checking coroutine final suspend self
reference
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
14 matches
Mail list logo
