[Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6

2006-09-16 Thread kalium at gmx dot de
--- Comment #6 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 21:17 --- Like I already said, this has nothing to do with hardened extensions. Look at my patch. It is a problem related to the parser: bad code gets produced when "XWindowAttributes a;" is not at the beginning. -- kal

[Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6

2006-09-16 Thread kalium at gmx dot de
--- Comment #4 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:54 --- Note: the words "under hardened" in the title of the Gentoo Linux bug report are wrong -- the problem also occurs with a plain vanilla/non-hardened gcc. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109

[Bug middle-end/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6

2006-09-16 Thread kalium at gmx dot de
--- Comment #3 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:52 --- So you have a long-developed and relatively stable and good compiler and you don't develop it any more? Not good. The 4+ branch is pretty unstable. I had to downgrade the gcc 4.1.1 compiler on my Athlon XP and on my V

[Bug c++/29109] bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6

2006-09-16 Thread kalium at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:42 --- Created an attachment (id=12283) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12283&action=view) qt-3.3.6-gcc3.patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29109

[Bug c++/29109] New: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6

2006-09-16 Thread kalium at gmx dot de
is qt-3.3.6-r1. -- Summary: bad code produced when compiling qt-3.3.6 Product: gcc Version: 3.4.6 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: kaliu

[Bug middle-end/25120] builtin *printf handlers are confused by -fexec-charset

2006-09-16 Thread kalium at gmx dot de
--- Comment #15 from kalium at gmx dot de 2006-09-16 16:32 --- (In reply to comment #14) > Fixed. > Where can I get fixes to gcc 3.4.6? (the branch is closed...) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25120