[Bug jit/119700] New: Add va_list and other va_* functions in JIT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119700 Bug ID: 119700 Summary: Add va_list and other va_* functions in JIT Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: jit

[Bug tree-optimization/119470] Missed strlen despite unreachable() in noinline increment function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119470 --- Comment #2 from Kael Franco --- Created attachment 60884 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60884&action=edit -fdump-tree-optimized

[Bug tree-optimization/119470] Missed strlen despite unreachable() in noinline increment function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119470 --- Comment #1 from Kael Franco --- Created attachment 60883 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60883&action=edit -fdump-tree-original

[Bug tree-optimization/119470] New: Missed strlen despite unreachable() in noinline increment function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119470 Bug ID: 119470 Summary: Missed strlen despite unreachable() in noinline increment function Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/119431] Missed strlen when cmp to NUL forwards with increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119431 --- Comment #3 from Kael Franco --- Bug also reported to Clang: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/132578

[Bug tree-optimization/119431] Missed strlen when cmp to NUL forwards with increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119431 --- Comment #2 from Kael Franco --- Flags were -O3

[Bug tree-optimization/119431] Missed strlen when cmp to NUL forwards with increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119431 --- Comment #1 from Kael Franco --- Created attachment 60855 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60855&action=edit -fdump-tree-optimized

[Bug tree-optimization/119431] New: Missed strlen when cmp to NUL forwards with increments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119431 Bug ID: 119431 Summary: Missed strlen when cmp to NUL forwards with increments Product: gcc Version: 14.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Co

[Bug tree-optimization/119262] Missed vectorize loop within bitshift when using one bool rather than two

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119262 --- Comment #1 from Kael Franco --- Created attachment 60733 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60733&action=edit Generated assembly

[Bug tree-optimization/119262] New: Missed vectorize loop within bitshift when using one bool rather than two

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119262 Bug ID: 119262 Summary: Missed vectorize loop within bitshift when using one bool rather than two Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/119223] GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119223 --- Comment #5 from Kael Franco --- Created attachment 60714 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60714&action=edit Test program #2 -fdump-tree-optimized

[Bug tree-optimization/119223] GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119223 --- Comment #3 from Kael Franco --- Created attachment 60712 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60712&action=edit Test program #1 -fdump-tree-optimized

[Bug tree-optimization/119223] New: GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119223 Bug ID: 119223 Summary: GCC does not optimize with AVX in bitshift with if condition Product: gcc Version: 14.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal