https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119383
Kacper Słomiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kacper.slominski72 at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118923
Bug ID: 118923
Summary: Wrong code generated for member function pointer call
in range-for loop
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115885
Bug ID: 115885
Summary: Build errors when libstdc++ math.h included in extern
"C" block
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115199
--- Comment #3 from Kacper Słomiński ---
For the version in the bug report the first bad diff is:
--- foo-good-foo.c.044t.dse12024-05-22 23:22:35.962903496 +0200
+++ foo-bad-foo.c.044t.dse1 2024-05-22 23:22:23.869476999 +0200
@@ -11,7 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114952
Bug ID: 114952
Summary: False positive -Wmaybe-uninitialized starting at -O3
in libbpf
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109648
Kacper Słomiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kacper.slominski72 at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113467
Kacper Słomiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kacper.slominski72 at gmail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107512
Bug ID: 107512
Summary: Defaulted virtual destructor not considered in
constexpr context
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106036
--- Comment #2 from Kacper Słomiński ---
Okay, this seems to have been a false alarm, sorry for that! Our C library was
missing the typedef for intptr_t in unistd.h, which POSIX does specify. After
adding that, libgcc compiled without problems.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106036
Bug ID: 106036
Summary: Missing stdint.h include in libgcc/libgcov.h
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106024
Bug ID: 106024
Summary: ICE on missing template keyword in template method
call in pack expansion
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102508
--- Comment #1 from Kacper Słomiński ---
Was about to report this myself; here is a minimal test case that reproduces
this issue without using any external libraries. It causes a slightly different
ICE in gimplify_expr in gimplify.c:14879 for GC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101765
--- Comment #2 from Kacper Słomiński ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #1)
> I am not sure that a VLA can be used in a coroutine (neither can alloca, if
> I remember correctly) [so not sure that this is ICE on valid, it could be
> ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101765
Bug ID: 101765
Summary: ICE when using a VLA inside of a coroutine
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
14 matches
Mail list logo