https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69088
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
/*
thank you for your answer.
A.Benaïssa
Comment:
Please consider this case:
*/
#include
int main()
{
float A = 0.F ;
_Bool B1 = 1.F / A ;
signed char
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69086
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
thank you for your clear answer.comment: And I imagine that it is not possible
to define in C the complex value (inf,inf).
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
#include
int main()
{
float B = 0.F ;
int A = 1.F / B ;
__float128 B1 = 0.Q ;
intA1 = 1.Q / B1 ;
printf("A = %d\n", A );
printf("
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
# include
# include
# include
int main( void)
{
float A1 = 1.f/0.f ;
float A2 = 1.f/0.f ;
_Complex float A3 = A1 + A2*1.Fi ;
printf("%f\n",A1);
printf("
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67930
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you for your reply.
Comments::
I am not convinced by your point of view.
1- the compilation step does not deliver any message.
2- I modify the string by address and this is permitted by C for any e
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
# include
# include
void test ( char **A )
{
*A[0] = 'a' ;
}
int main( void)
{
char *b = "omega" ;
test ( &b ) ;
printf ( "b = %s \n" , b ) ;
return 0 ;
}
/*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67840
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
THank you for your reply. A.BENAÏSSA
Le Dimanche 4 octobre 2015 16h26, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
a écrit :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67840
Andrew Pinski changed:
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
/* #define function error */
#include
#include
#include
#define tadjib(x) (sizeof( x )== sizeof( float ) ?cosf(x) \
:sizeof( x )== sizeof( double ) ?cos(x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67667
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you for your quick and clear reply .
Note:
I think that using the same symbol operato as GNU extension for doing two
different things
can be a potential source of blind errors .
I confirm that t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67668
--- Comment #4 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you for your quick and clear reply .
Note:
I think that using the same symbol operator for doing two different things
can be a potential source of blind errors.
I confirm that this is only a per
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
int main(void)
{
~( 1. + 0.i ) ;
~(1.) ;
return 0 ;
}
/* Results::
main_cmp1_err.c:4:3: attention : statement wi
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67570
--- Comment #4 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you very much for your reply.
Please do not take care of the first set of values for
MIN_NORMALIZED and in place you can test those new values.
MIN_NORMALIZED
1.755494 E-038 for float
2.2250
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67570
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you for your reply.
A.BENAÏSSA
Post scriptum:
Please can you confirm if you have time that the following
positive floating point values are correct.
--
MIN_D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569
--- Comment #5 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you. A.Benaïssa
Le Lundi 14 septembre 2015 13h27, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
a écrit :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What |Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569
--- Comment #4 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you for your replty. A.Benaïssa
Le Lundi 14 septembre 2015 11h22, mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
a écrit :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67569
Marek Polacek changed:
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
#include
int main(void)
{
int pos;
int pos1 ;
int pos2 ;
long double A= 0.L ;
union {
long double X
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
/* Erroneous compiler error message */
int main(void)
{
int *A = (int *)533 ;
float F = 1.F;
A - F ;
return 0 ;
}
/*
Results:
In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67547
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you very much for your reply.
A.Benaïssa
Le Vendredi 11 septembre 2015 13h25, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
a écrit :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67095
--- Comment #2 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you for your reply. A.Benaïssa.
Le Dimanche 2 août 2015 13h46, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
a écrit :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67095
Andrew Pinski changed:
What
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
include
include
int main(void)
{
printf(" %E\n", nexttowardf ( 0.F , 1.F ) ) ;
printf(" %A\n", nexttowardf ( 0.F
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main(void)
{
float A = -1.f ;
float B = logf(A);
printf ( "B = %f \n" , B) ;
printf ( "errno = %d \n" , errn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66613
--- Comment #5 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you for your mail.I do not know where is the error but after execution I
do not have the good result. anyway!
Compile Flags:
-std=c99
-Warray-bounds
-Wall
-Wextra
-Waddress
-Wbad-function-cast
-Wfor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66613
--- Comment #4 from BENAÏSSA ---
Thank you for your mail.
Compile Flags: -std=c99
-Warray-bounds
-Wall
-Wextra
-Waddress
-Wbad-function-cast
-Wformat
-Wformat-contains-nul
-Wformat-extra-args
-Wformat-nonliteral
-Wformat-security
-Wform
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ka_bena at yahoo dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
#include
#include
#include
int main(void)
{
printf( "\n");
printf("/**/\n");
printf( "\n&q
25 matches
Mail list logo
