--- Comment #5 from k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com 2009-03-28
05:55 ---
Created an attachment (id=17553)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17553&action=view)
Preprocessed source of test case
Created with "avr-gcc -v -save-temps -mmcu=att
--- Comment #3 from k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com 2009-03-27
17:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=17545)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17545&action=view)
Second test case with void functions.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39510
--- Comment #2 from k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com 2009-03-27
17:46 ---
I can't see how register usage and calling convention affect this.
As I said before, this behaviour bit me in a naked interrupt handler, with no
arguments and no return value.
I'm attachi
dBy: k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39510
--- Comment #1 from k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com 2008-12-14
00:10 ---
My mistake, ICALL & IJMP instructions take word (not byte) addresses. Therefore
the generated code is correct.
Sorry for the noise.
--
k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com cha
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com
GCC host triplet: x86-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet
--- Comment #1 from k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com 2008-11-21
06:05 ---
Created an attachment (id=16730)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16730&action=view)
Test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38209
gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: k dot kosciuszkiewicz+gcc at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i386-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i386-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38209
