https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116869
--- Comment #3 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> msdosdjgpp might be the only target which does not define
> NO_PROFILE_COUNTERS .
I figured as much, but wasn't sure. From briefly poking around i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116869
Bug ID: 116869
Summary: Profiler count register conflicts with regparm
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549
--- Comment #12 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #11)
> Generally a patch should be sent to gcc-patc...@gcc.gnu.org. See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html. The patches attached to a Bugzilla
> ticket a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110128
--- Comment #1 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com ---
Additionally, the following example does not produce any -Wattributes warnings
at all, but the attributes are still not copied:
template
struct check_num
{
static void chec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110128
Bug ID: 110128
Summary: copy attribute does not copy from template
specializations
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107496
Bug ID: 107496
Summary: [Feature request] Conditional attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107439
Bug ID: 107439
Summary: use of static member function in requires-expression
depends on declaration order
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107429
--- Comment #2 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com ---
Thanks, I thought I searched but somehow missed that PR.
>From a user perspective it seems very surprising that this workaround compiles,
but the obvious implementation doesn't. I do hope it ge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107429
Bug ID: 107429
Summary: misdiagnosed "constraint depends on itself" in
overloaded functions
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107417
Bug ID: 107417
Summary: g++ fails to recognize parameter pack in
requires-expression
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107280
Bug ID: 107280
Summary: ICE: tree check: expected constructor, have
view_convert_expr in cxx_eval_store_expression, at
cp/constexpr.cc:5928
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549
--- Comment #9 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 51840
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51840&action=edit
diagnostics
This patch adds checks for:
- Top-level AS-qualifiers on fields, local variables, func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69549
--- Comment #8 from jwjagersma at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 51808
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51808&action=edit
basic implementation
Tentative patch.
Produces working code but could use some (many) checks to d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98096
Bug ID: 98096
Summary: Inconsistent operand numbering for asm goto with
in-out operands
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
14 matches
Mail list logo
