--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:43
---
Fixed on trunk. I will backport to 4.5 and 4.4 except the portion dealing with
char4 internal units which is not supported on these earlier releases. Backport
will occur in a few days or weeks. I would like to
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:28
---
Subject: Bug 45710
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 01:28:39 2010
New Revision: 164548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164548
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:22
---
Backport complete. Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:21
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 01:21:10 2010
New Revision: 164547
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164547
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle
Backp
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:19
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 01:19:13 2010
New Revision: 164546
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164546
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle
Backp
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 01:11
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 01:11:16 2010
New Revision: 164545
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164545
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle
Backp
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 00:58
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 00:58:12 2010
New Revision: 164544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164544
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-23 00:53
---
Subject: Bug 45710
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Sep 23 00:53:15 2010
New Revision: 164543
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164543
Log:
2010-09-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 19:12
---
I do not see the problem with gfortran 4.3.4 on Cygwin
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 19:09
---
Please post result of gfortran -v
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45748
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 15:07
---
I don't see a need to backport. Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 03:10
---
Subject: Bug 45723
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Sep 22 03:10:24 2010
New Revision: 164507
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164507
Log:
2010-09-21 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 02:52
---
Created an attachment (id=21860)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21860&action=view)
Tentative patch, not regression tested
Our interpretation of this:
3 An ampersand character f
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-22 02:26
---
Changed summary of this bug to reflect that I will be adjusting the padding of
internal unit character arrays and initial space on some lines. On my system I
see:
&NL1 JUNK
space A= 1.000,JUNK
spa
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 03:20
---
With current trunk, gfortran 4.6, I get:
BEFORE:
001 @@@
002 @@@
003
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-21 03:08
---
Here is a case where we do have to evaluate at run time. So maybe we can not
do what is proposed above.
character(10):: advancevar
advancevar = "no"
write(*, "(a)", advance=advancevar) &qu
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-20 04:46
---
Created an attachment (id=21841)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21841&action=view)
Possible patch
This patch passes regression testing. Don't seek if filesize is zero.
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-19 20:01
---
This is an OS specific error. libgfortran is attempting to seek to the end of
the file to prepare for appending. Obviously, one can not seek /dev/null.
I will see if we can detect that the file is unseekable
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-18 18:18
---
This issue, line ending for namelist to character arrays, has come up before.
I don't remember the outcome of that previous discussion. I will research a
little.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org ch
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 04:40
---
Fixed on trunk, will backport to 4.4 and 4.5 in a few days.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 04:39
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 14 04:39:13 2010
New Revision: 164267
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164267
Log:
2010-09-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-14 04:37
---
Subject: Bug 45532
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Tue Sep 14 04:37:02 2010
New Revision: 164266
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164266
Log:
2010-09-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 16:14
---
Is this something for the FE to do?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36841
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 15:45
---
I have not tested this with latest trunk, but I wonder if any of the recent
optimization work has improved this. Can it be closed yet?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31139
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 15:42
---
Adding to my list
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-12 15:38
---
When we break abi for kind=8 recl, we should fix all of these. I will assign to
myself so I don't forget. Moving out of enhancement status.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
ribute
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-08 19:03
---
This is very interesting (aka a real bugger):
Reversing the order of the declarations in
type curve_struct
type (line_struct) line
type (symbol_struct) symbol
end type
to
type curve_struct
type
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 19:27
---
I will have a go at this.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 02:10
---
> Update: More responses in comp.lang.fortran bring up the point that if
> trim(line)
> is supposed to return a temporary, the code might be conforming. Seems that
> the
> situation is not clear..
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 15:01
---
Dominique, thanks for testing that.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 15:00
---
Subject: Bug 43217
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 27 15:00:11 2010
New Revision: 163588
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163588
Log:
2010-08-27 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 14:02
---
Dominiq, can you test the output of the test case for me on PPC?
hollerith8.f90 in the gfortran post.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43217
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-27 06:50
---
Subject: Bug 43217
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 27 06:50:03 2010
New Revision: 163581
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163581
Log:
2010-08-27 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-26 02:13
---
Subject: Bug 41859
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Aug 26 02:12:49 2010
New Revision: 163561
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163561
Log:
2010-08-25 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-21 16:42
---
Created an attachment (id=21539)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21539&action=view)
Proposed patch
This patch adds the padding requested. Output of test case matches a few of th
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 22:56
---
This is not currently diagnosed during compilation. My original plan is to see
if I can do that with the front end and then close it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45143
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 20:32
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 20:28
---
Subject: Bug 45108
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Aug 19 20:28:09 2010
New Revision: 163387
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163387
Log:
2010-08-19 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 04:01
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 03:52
---
Created an attachment (id=21516)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21516&action=view)
Proposed patch
This patch will generate an error. If IOSTAT or IOMSG is used, the read will
cont
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-19 02:36
---
Subject: Bug 41859
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Aug 19 02:35:45 2010
New Revision: 163363
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163363
Log:
2010-08-19 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 03:18
---
There was some history regarding legacy codes as the reason why this does not
error out. ie looping back and trying again was a feature. I think I may put
this behind -std=legacy. It does seem odd the way we
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-17 03:13
---
Closing now
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-16 06:09
---
The problem resides in resolve_transfer. The checks are not performed because
the expression is wrapped in parenthesis and so the expression is of type
EXPR_OP, so resolve_transfer is just exited. The following
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-14 18:59
---
Subject: Bug 44931
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 14 18:59:18 2010
New Revision: 163245
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163245
Log:
2010-08-14 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
ReportedBy: jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: Cygwin
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45285
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 17:24
---
With or without the other patch, the gimple code has:
main (integer(kind=4) argc, character(kind=1) * * argv)
[tx_f90_pointers.f90 : 30:0] {
integer(kind=4) D.1535;
static integer(kind=4) options.0[8] = {68
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 15:11
---
I will try the other patch and see what this does.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45186
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 05:24
---
Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-13 05:14
---
Subject: Bug 42526
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Aug 13 05:14:18 2010
New Revision: 163220
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163220
Log:
2010-08-12 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 17:18
---
Paul, can you send me a preview of the new descriptor structure so I can be
planning the internal unit I/O impacts if any.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45128
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-09 00:31
---
Good
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44998
--- Comment #21 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-08 05:29
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #20 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-08 01:59
---
Subject: Bug 43954
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 8 01:59:15 2010
New Revision: 162990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162990
Log:
2010-08-07 Daniel Franke
PR fortr
--- Comment #18 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-08 01:59
---
Subject: Bug 31588
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Aug 8 01:59:15 2010
New Revision: 162990
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162990
Log:
2010-08-07 Daniel Franke
PR fortr
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 21:10
---
Yes, fixed. I will make a test case out of this with the -Wall so we do not
regress.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 16:52
---
Subject: Bug 31588
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 7 16:51:55 2010
New Revision: 162980
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162980
Log:
2010-08-07 Daniel Franke
20
--- Comment #16 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 16:52
---
Subject: Bug 43954
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 7 16:51:55 2010
New Revision: 162980
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162980
Log:
2010-08-07 Daniel Franke
20
--- Comment #15 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 15:43
---
I have the patch for backport to 4.5 applied to my local 4.5 branch and I am
regression testing now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43954
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 12:10
---
Subject: Bug 45143
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 7 12:10:25 2010
New Revision: 162979
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162979
Log:
2010-08-07 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-07 12:03
---
Subject: Bug 45143
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 7 12:03:23 2010
New Revision: 162978
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162978
Log:
2010-08-07 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #137 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 02:42
---
*** Bug 45175 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-04 02:42
---
This is a duplicate of PR 323
See http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=323
Just use -ffloat-store.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 323 ***
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #14 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-02 13:19
---
Closing as fixed. Regarding comment #7. I do not see the problem on 4.5. I
reran tests here on my machine that failed with 4.6 and there were no failures
on 4.5
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-08-01 17:28
---
This appears to be fixed now from the commit of patch in #10. The related
failures showing in gcc test results are no longer there.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 17:04
---
I see the problem with 4.4.3 as well. I think the patch in #10 is only masking
it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-31 16:28
---
I can see one here on a 32 bit machine. Moving string.h down in the file as
noted by David Edelsohn fixes it. I also changed the return type to void in
trans-io.c.
Index: inquire.c
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 14:10
---
Mine
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 14:06
---
#7 confirms my suspicions. I will try to have a look into this in the next few
days. If anyone else has time, please do.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 01:55
---
I see this as an enhancement.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 01:49
---
This is really odd because the patch does not touch these parts of the library,
at least for inquire_3.f90. I wonder if there is something latent here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45131
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-30 01:47
---
Reply to comment #9.
Yes, this is what I was thinking. I wanted to float the first step out there to
see what else we would discover. As seen in PR 45131 there are other oddities
we need to deal with
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 01:32
---
Subject: Bug 44931
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Thu Jul 29 01:32:23 2010
New Revision: 162667
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162667
Log:
2010-07-28 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-29 00:59
---
I will have a look.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 22:45
---
Closing
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 22:24
---
Generally, the gfortran testsuite test cases are testing specific features and
not necessarily strict Standard compliance. There is no need to submit PRs for
test cases unless they fail unexpectedly or the
--- Comment #13 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 19:10
---
Subject: Bug 42852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 25 19:10:09 2010
New Revision: 162518
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162518
Log:
2010-07-25 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 17:37
---
Here is another possibility. Only one namelist regression with this on.
Index: trans-io.c
===
--- trans-io.c (revision 162507)
+++ trans-io.c
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 17:02
---
I doubt I would be allowed since 4.5.1 is at release candidate 1 phase.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42852
--- Comment #4 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 16:21
---
Naturally the patch in #2 breaks everything else for namelists at run time
unless I messed up something else here.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45066
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 15:38
---
Closing as fixed.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #9 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 15:35
---
Subject: Bug 42852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 25 15:35:04 2010
New Revision: 162514
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162514
Log:
2010-07-25 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #8 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 15:08
---
Subject: Bug 42852
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Jul 25 15:07:45 2010
New Revision: 162512
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162512
Log:
2010-07-25 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortr
--- Comment #2 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 15:04
---
This patchlet at least works for the reduce test case. Assuming there is
nothing left to translate. I am not sure this is the right approach, bu the
-fdump-tree-original matches for with and without -fno-whole
--- Comment #1 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 14:26
---
Confirmed. Works with -fno-whole-file.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #69 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 01:21
---
Great detective work folks! The sneaky bugs usually are simple to fix.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40011
--- Comment #7 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-25 00:48
---
test_inquire.f90:17.10:
inquire(6,file=str1)
1
Error: INQUIRE statement at (1) cannot contain both FILE and UNIT specifiers
However, with a simple modification to the patch the following works
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-24 04:08
---
Created an attachment (id=21296)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21296&action=view)
Proposed pathc
This patch uses ttyname to get the /dev/pts/* name. I have not tried this on a
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 12:28
---
I was getting back to this and noticed that we no longer ICE on the original
test case. I suppose then this has become an "accepts invalid or there is
something not being initialized and the behavior is r
--- Comment #17 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-23 03:05
---
With 4.5 about to pop a release it would be good to get this fixed for it, with
release manager approval
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44660
--- Comment #32 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:37
---
Rainer, this is OK to back port. Do you want me to do so?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38946
--- Comment #6 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:25
---
Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-21 04:21
---
Subject: Bug 44697
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jul 21 04:20:58 2010
New Revision: 162362
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162362
Log:
2010-07-20 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #3 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 04:35
---
Kai, would you test this for me please.
Index: ftell_3.f90
===
--- ftell_3.f90 (revision 162291)
+++ ftell_3.f90 (working copy)
@@ -3,9 +3,10
--- Comment #12 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 01:10
---
Fixed, thanks for report.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 01:09
---
Done.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-20 01:07
---
Not needed. Closing.
--
jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #11 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-19 13:12
---
Subject: Bug 44953
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Jul 19 13:11:54 2010
New Revision: 162304
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=162304
Log:
2010-07-19 Jerry DeLisle
PR li
--- Comment #10 from jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-07-18 22:19
---
Full regression test passed on IBM Power 5. I will submit patch for approval
this evening. Thanks for bug report and testing.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44953
1 - 100 of 3058 matches
Mail list logo
