https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85619
--- Comment #4 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Following up on that issue. I've just checked against GCC 11 documentation.
The two points are still open.
Thanks beforehand.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82798
--- Comment #5 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Following up on that bug report, I've checked GCC 11 documentation.
Only 3/, part of 5/ (-Wmultistatement-macros) and 6/ have been fixed.
Points 1/, 2/, 4/, part of 5/ (-Wreorder) and 7/ remain.
Thanks beforeha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50064
Julien ÉLIE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83011
--- Comment #8 from Julien ÉLIE ---
"I do agree that the warning in this case is too difficult to deal with and
should be adjusted so I'm going to confirm this report on that basis."
FWIW, the same warning is still present in GCC 10.2.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83011
--- Comment #7 from Julien ÉLIE ---
*** Bug 103352 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103352
Julien ÉLIE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: julien at trigofacile dot com
Target Milestone: ---
When building
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/InterNetNews/inn/main/lib/timer.c I have a
warning with -Wformat-truncation=2
len = 52 * timer_count + 27 + (prefix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85619
--- Comment #3 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Many thanks, Martin, for willing to take care of it. (I've also seen your
message in bug 71283.)
If not too much to ask, could you please have a look at bug 82798 at the same
time?
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: julien at trigofacile dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In GCC 8.1.0 documentation
(https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-8.1.0/gcc/Warning-Options.html):
1/ -Wif-not-aligned is said to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83011
--- Comment #6 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Many thanks for your kind explanation, Martin. Perfectly understood.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83011
--- Comment #4 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Martin, the following thing still puzzles me.
len = 52 * timer_count + 27 + (prefix == NULL ? 0 : strlen(prefix)) + 1;
=> gives a warning, as explained below
len = 1 + 52 * timer_count + 27 + (prefix == NULL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83011
--- Comment #2 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Created attachment 42644
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=42644&action=edit
Preprocessed translation unit of timer.c
Thanks Martin for your response.
I attached the result of the following
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: julien at trigofacile dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Hi,
Trying to build INN, I encounter the following warning:
timer.c: Dans la fonction « TMRsummary
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82798
--- Comment #2 from Julien ÉLIE ---
Other points:
6/ -Wsuggest-final-types and -Wsuggest-final-methods should be mentioned for
C++ (and maybe Objective-C++) only.
7/ -Wc++11-compat and -Wc++14-compat are present in the -Wall list but without
th
Priority: P3
Component: web
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: julien at trigofacile dot com
Target Milestone: ---
In GCC 7 documentation:
1/ One can read "Some options, such as -Wall and -Wextra, turn on other
options, such as -Wunused" an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51853
--- Comment #3 from Julien ÉLIE 2012-01-14
08:13:45 UTC ---
Created attachment 26321
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26321
Result of preprocessed file
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51853
Julien ÉLIE changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |c
--- Comment #2 from Julien ÉLIE 2012-01-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51853
Bug #: 51853
Summary: MPFR assertion failure with Python: p >= 2 && p <=
((mpfr_prec_t)((mpfr_uprec_t)(~(mpfr_uprec_t)0)>>1))
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50064
Bug #: 50064
Summary: Failure in stage 2 (lazy binding) on openbsd
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
19 matches
Mail list logo
