[Bug c/30475] assert(int+100 > int) optimized away

2007-03-08 Thread js at linuxtv dot org
--- Comment #55 from js at linuxtv dot org 2007-03-08 16:22 --- Point taken. I was misled by the mentioning of C99 6.3.1.3 in comment #18, that this would apply to integer conversion. Funnily enough, C99 3.4.3 even says "An example of undefined behavior is the behavior on in

[Bug c/30475] assert(int+100 > int) optimized away

2007-03-07 Thread js at linuxtv dot org
--- Comment #53 from js at linuxtv dot org 2007-03-08 01:03 --- I read all this and the mailing list thread with great interest, however I think there is a fundamental flaw in the reasoning: C90 6.2.1.2 / C99 6.3.1.3 defines signed integer overflow as "implementation-defined beha

[Bug driver/22231] New: -MG ignores missing headers even with -c

2005-06-29 Thread js at linuxtv dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: driver AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: js at linuxtv dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22231