https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|REOPENED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
--- Comment #9 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
I believe this PR only relates to the fact that GCC support for SHF_GNU_RETAIN
was available before GOLD supported that section flag.
My proposed patch was to turn off GCC support for SHF_GNU_RETAIN if a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
--- Comment #6 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
I've posted a patch where the HAVE_GAS_SHF_GNU_RETAIN configure test has been
extended to check for SHF_GNU_RETAIN gold support:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/562100.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
--- Comment #4 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
Since gold is not built by default, should we just disable SHF_GNU_RETAIN
support if gold has been built at all, for Binutils versions without the gold
patch.
There's 2 weeks between the GCC "used" imply
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
Jozef Lawrynowicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
Bug ID: 98146
Summary: [11 Regression] section type conflict when "used"
attribute is applied to decl with specific section
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #8 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #7)
> (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #4)
> > > GAS merges the "R" flag state in .section declarati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #7 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jozef Lawrynowicz from comment #4)
> > GAS merges the "R" flag state in .section declarations, silently, and with
> > logical OR, and GCC should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #4 from Jozef Lawrynowicz ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> The issue here is that what should happen when definitions marked with used
> attribute and unmarked definitions are put in the same section. It has
> nothing
> to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #23 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #22)
> I tested the patches on x86_64-linux and confirmed that the branches can
> bootstrap msp430-elf, so I went ahead and pushed them.
>
> If you're no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #19 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #18)
> The patch will apply cleanly to gcc-10 but not gcc-9. Let me know if you
> want me to prepare a patch for the gcc-9 branch.
If it's not too much w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #16 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #15)
> Hmm, I get the same error for a out-of-tree binutils built from today's git
> sources:
>
> GNU assembler (GNU Binutils) 2.35.50.20201112
> Copyrig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #14 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #13)
> I tried a bootstrap of gcc-10 and I get this error during libgcc/configure
>
> conftest.s: Assembler messages:
> conftest.s:168: Error: unknown ps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #12 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks!
I've set off a full msp430-elf build and regtest.
I'll look at backporting it to GCC8/9/10 branches after testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #9 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8)
> My attempt to build msp430 fails with:
>
> In file included from
> /home/jwakely/gcc/msp430-elf/msp430-elf/include/stdint.h:13,
> f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
--- Comment #2 from jozefl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 49547
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49547&action=edit
tester.ii
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Would it be possible to provide a preprocess
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97798
Bug ID: 97798
Summary: FTB msp430-elf error: the value of
'__gnu_cxx::__numeric_traits_integer<__int20>::__max'
is not usable in a constant expression
Product: gcc
18 matches
Mail list logo
