[Bug c++/78704] New: operator-> pointer return type is not recognized as pointer type

mal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: joseph.h.garvin at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- My coworker Jay Miller discovered this but he couldn't create an account because of the spam restriction in effect. He

[Bug c++/53843] Macros following string literals don't expand in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53843 --- Comment #3 from Joseph Garvin 2012-07-03 20:00:28 UTC --- Sorry, I Googled for "C++11 preprocessor changes" and didn't find anything discussing this. Do you have a link?

[Bug c++/53843] Macros following string literals don't expand in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53843 --- Comment #1 from Joseph Garvin 2012-07-03 19:56:28 UTC --- Forgot to mention inserting a space between "x" and bar fixes the error.

[Bug c++/53843] New: Macros following string literals don't expand in C++11 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53843 Bug #: 53843 Summary: Macros following string literals don't expand in C++11 mode Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/52299] GCC warns on compile time division by zero erroneously

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52299 --- Comment #7 from Joseph Garvin 2012-02-20 17:56:20 UTC --- Sorry, I should have copy and pasted the whole file. I was trying to save people's time by providing a condensed snippet ;p (In reply to comment #6) > This reproduces it: > > templat

[Bug c++/52299] GCC warns on compile time division by zero erroneously

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52299 --- Comment #3 from Joseph Garvin 2012-02-20 16:47:23 UTC --- Also this is x86-64, which could be relevant since it affects the underlying type of std::size_t.

[Bug c++/52299] GCC warns on compile time division by zero erroneously

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52299 --- Comment #2 from Joseph Garvin 2012-02-20 16:45:21 UTC --- #include template struct test { static const std::size_t a_ = x ? 10 / x : 10; }; I just forgot to copy and paste the include. My command line is just "g++ alignptrtest.cpp"

[Bug c++/52299] New: GCC warns on compile time division by zero erroneously

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52299 Bug #: 52299 Summary: GCC warns on compile time division by zero erroneously Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.4.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/52032] Function and class attributes should optionally take a bool parameter enabling them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52032 --- Comment #4 from Joseph Garvin 2012-01-30 21:13:37 UTC --- That's why I put the severity as enhancement :) I thought of a better example. template void __attribute__((always_inline(force_inline))) foo() { // ... } Now you can choose whe

[Bug c++/52032] Function and class attributes should optionally take a bool parameter enabling them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52032 Joseph Garvin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|WONTFIX

[Bug c++/52032] New: Function and class attributes should optionally take a bool parameter enabling them

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52032 Bug #: 52032 Summary: Function and class attributes should optionally take a bool parameter enabling them Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown S

[Bug c++/52031] New: G++ crashes when std::size_t is initalized with a float inside a template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52031 Bug #: 52031 Summary: G++ crashes when std::size_t is initalized with a float inside a template Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCON