https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110139
--- Comment #4 from Joseph Faulls ---
Amazing, thanks for the swift response and fix! Ah yes, I didn't try -pedantic.
Do we want a patch for this? I can submit if you like, but it'd likely be you
who accepts it :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110139
--- Comment #1 from Joseph Faulls ---
Created attachment 55270
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55270&action=edit
Similar test case that causes a warning in gcc / error in clang
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110139
Bug ID: 110139
Summary: [libstdc++] Ambiguous use of [] operator for 0-sized
arrays (with clang)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109989
Bug ID: 109989
Summary: RISC-V: Missing sign extension with int to float
conversion with 64bit soft floats
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
Joseph Faulls changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
--- Comment #2 from Joseph Faulls ---
Created attachment 52388
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52388&action=edit
main.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
--- Comment #1 from Joseph Faulls ---
Created attachment 52387
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52387&action=edit
myfunc.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104460
Bug ID: 104460
Summary: [RISCV] Incorrect DW_AT_high_pc for assembly source
with linker relaxation
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
URL: https://github.com/riscv-collab/r
