[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 jol_indien at yahoo dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #14 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- Created attachment 38619 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38619&action=edit Merged patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU + add Nano / Eden x2/x4 families arch keyword

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #13 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12) > I will merge together your follow-up patch, and commit the combined patch. > > BTW: Can you please send me what to put in the ChangeLog as

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #11 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- Created attachment 38618 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38618&action=edit patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU + add Nano / Eden x2/x4 families arch keywords Thi

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #10 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- this patch doesn't do the trick, it detects the VIA Nano CPU as a core2 one. I guess the problem is that processor is first set to PROCESSOR_GENERIC but the VIA Nano CPU check (ie CENTAUR v

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #7 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- Created attachment 38595 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38595&action=edit patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU against gcc git repository as for Sun May 29 17:29:

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #5 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- Created attachment 36245 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36245&action=edit patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU for gcc 4.9+ versions

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 jol_indien at yahoo dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36239|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #3 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- Here are two new patches, one for gcc 4.8.x versions (tested with 4.8.4 & 4.8.5), one for 4.9+ versions (tested with 4.9.3). This patch is safer, support of VIA Nano based on CPU vendor

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #2 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- This new version of the patch is: * an optimisation, avoiding modifying code that does not need to be * a bugfix, fixing "nocona" architecture detection Please consider applying in

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 jol_indien at yahoo dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36234|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug target/67310] New: [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jol_indien at yahoo dot fr Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 36234 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36234&action=edit patch to properly det