[Bug libgcc/98395] libgcc_s.so.1 almost 10x bigger in gcc-10.2 than gcc-9.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395 john.frankish at outlook dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID St

[Bug libgcc/98395] libgcc_s.so.1 almost 10x bigger in gcc-10.2 than gcc-9.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395 --- Comment #4 from john.frankish at outlook dot com --- Both are stripped and all the other gcc libs are of comparable size between gcc-9.2 and gcc-10.2. I'll compile with -O2 instead of -Os in the next couple of days to see if that makes a diff

[Bug libgcc/98395] libgcc_s.so.1 almost 10x bigger in gcc-10.2 than gcc-9.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395 --- Comment #2 from john.frankish at outlook dot com --- Something significant must have changed, or be wrong, for such a big increase in size

[Bug libgcc/98395] New: libgcc_s.so.1 almost 10x bigger in gcc-10.2 than gcc-9.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98395 Bug ID: 98395 Summary: libgcc_s.so.1 almost 10x bigger in gcc-10.2 than gcc-9.2 Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio