[Bug fortran/44931] For INPUT_UNIT, INQUIRE NAME= should not return "stdin"

2010-07-15 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #4 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2010-07-15 21:49 --- I noticed that Fedora now include symlinks for /dev/stdin, /dev/stdout, /dev/stderr. It would be reasonable to use those path names if there is an interest in avoiding blank names. This convention may not hold on all

[Bug fortran/44931] For INPUT_UNIT, INQUIRE NAME= should not return "stdin"

2010-07-15 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #3 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2010-07-15 21:39 --- Intel Fortran currently returns the actual device name (e.g. "/dev/pts/3") but also uses "stdin" if the input is from a pipe. I sent a similar low-priority bug report to Intel, and they tentat

[Bug fortran/44931] New: For INPUT_UNIT, INQUIRE NAME= should not return "stdin"

2010-07-13 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
INPUT_UNIT, INQUIRE NAME= should not return "stdin" Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jkra

[Bug fortran/44830] New: Function return-type declaration with specification expression rejected for renamed derived types

2010-07-05 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44830

[Bug fortran/44814] ISO_C_BINDING types inherited from a USEd module are corrupted

2010-07-04 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #1 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2010-07-04 19:09 --- I updated my code to use ISO_C_BINDING directly, but still get this bug. In order to avoid corruption by the USEd module, the ISO_C_BINDING imports must all be done on the first USE statement. This code still fails

[Bug fortran/44814] New: ISO_C_BINDING types inherited from a USEd module are corrupted

2010-07-04 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44814

[Bug fortran/44735] New: ICE on FORALL with character array pointer

2010-06-30 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44735

[Bug fortran/44702] New: ISO_C_BINDING does not allow multiple "USE, ONLY" local names.

2010-06-28 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44702

[Bug preprocessor/37373] New: Variadic macros fail when generated by other macros.

2008-09-04 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
d at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37373

[Bug fortran/37224] New: Request for C string literal syntax

2008-08-24 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37224

[Bug fortran/36267] New: Segfault ICE on assignment of a string pointer to a substring target

2008-05-19 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
rtedBy: jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36267

[Bug fortran/28378] Intrinsic extensions should be deselectable via command line

2008-05-13 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #3 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2008-05-13 17:05 --- This is an important to fix. I just ran into problems from this. Gfortran is supposed to aim for standards conformance, but vendor extensions are not supposed to break valid code. I think this behavior is a Standards

[Bug fortran/35707] Search /usr/local/include and /usr/include for .mod files

2008-05-08 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #3 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2008-05-08 18:19 --- Fortran files should not be put into /usr/local/include or /usr/include. Those directories are defined for C headers. It is particularly bad to put binary files there. We should instead develop a standard location for

[Bug fortran/29471] Warn with -std=f95/f2003 when BOZ is used at invalid places

2007-12-11 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #15 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2007-12-12 01:04 --- Subject: Re: Warn with -std=f95/f2003 when BOZ is used at invalid places burnus at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: ... >> Maybe there should be a "-f[no-]boz-range-check" to exclude range errors just >

[Bug fortran/29471] Warn with -std=f95/f2003 when BOZ is used at invalid places

2007-12-11 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #13 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2007-12-11 19:40 --- My previous post here was a bit confused by differences in F95 and F2003, and my misunderstanding of Gfortran's BOZ extension. As I understand the F2003 standard, the expression "INT(z'ff',1)&quo

[Bug fortran/29471] Warn with -std=f95/f2003 when BOZ is used at invalid places

2007-03-15 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #6 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2007-03-16 03:53 --- One more comment: I just checked the INT() intrisic for F2003. It actually still states that a BOZ is initially interpreted as the largest integer type (ugh!) REAL() has the correct definition of interpreting as the

[Bug fortran/29471] Warn with -std=f95/f2003 when BOZ is used at invalid places

2007-03-15 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
--- Comment #5 from jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com 2007-03-16 03:46 --- BOZ processing was recently broken in gfortran. I assume it relates to the issues here. The current problem is shown in this bit of code: write(*,*)'NaN(8)=',real(z'FFF8',8) end

[Bug fortran/31144] New: Gfortran module names are not Standards compliant

2007-03-11 Thread jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com
: gcc Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jkrahn at nc dot rr dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31144