https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100417
--- Comment #3 from jkb at sanger dot ac.uk ---
I'd definitely be in favour of John's rewording of the warning - "data pointed
to by ...". This definitely led us up the garden path for a while.
While I agree the code could have been written dif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100417
Bug ID: 100417
Summary: False positive -Wmaybe-uninitalized with malloc.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
