https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82063
--- Comment #2 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org ---
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:32 PM, manu at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> This is already possible:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Option-properties.html
>
> LangEnabledBy(l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434
--- Comment #7 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org ---
On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 4:20 AM, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> Do you think it might be feasible to update resource usage of a schedule
> group?
> Or would it be easier to replac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81434
--- Comment #5 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org ---
On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 4:25 AM, wilco at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> To more accurately schedule fusion pairs wouldn't we need to specify the
> scheduling behaviour of the group as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
--- Comment #18 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org ---
On 07/12/2016 09:36 AM, bugzilla-gcc at thewrittenword dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
>
> --- Comment #16 from The Written Word com> ---
&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66849
--- Comment #6 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org ---
On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 6:39 AM, simon at pushface dot org
wrote:
>> The t-aprofile that Ramana mentioned does support thumb/hard multilibs, but
>> makes this work by requiring arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
--- Comment #16 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org ---
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 8:03 AM, christian.eggers at kathrein dot de
wrote:
> Shall I also test the other patch?
The out-of-ssa patch is unfinished, and won't work without more changes.
Jim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66258
--- Comment #7 from jim.wilson at linaro dot org ---
On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 2:02 AM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>> Do you plan to backport this to gcc-5-branch?
I didn't realize it was broken on the gcc-5 release branch. I o
