--- Comment #12 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2009-05-19 18:07 ---
What he said. I'm perusing your patch, and I appreciate that you removed an
artificial restriction. The right place to catch this is up front, in a
concept check, rather than in _Destroy; since I'm not ab
--- Comment #9 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2009-05-19 17:32 ---
OK. Thanks for the explanation. Are the semantics documented somewhere?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40192
--- Comment #7 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2009-05-19 17:09 ---
I understand the desire for backward compatibility, but are the semantics
actually the same? Are the vector values arrays, or do they decay to pointers?
Section 23.1 says standard container elements have to be
--- Comment #5 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2009-05-19 16:36 ---
Whoa whoa whoa... The behavior seemed correct before. vector
shouldn't even be legal. Shouldn't the compiler to catch such a mistake?
--
jeff at schwabcenter dot com changed:
What
--- Comment #2 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2009-01-14 19:20 ---
I'm seeing the same thing with Boost.Bind (boost 1.37, GCC 4.2.1).
#include
#include
using boost::bind;
using std::multiplies;
int main() {
// Fine.
int const lvalue = 5;
bind(multiplies()
--- Comment #7 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:43 ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Warning-Options.html does not list
-Wswitch-default being enabled by -Wall.
--
jeff at schwabcenter dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:42 ---
> Is there any particular reason for changing the docs, rather than the code?
Kindly disregard that question. I have just been informed by a co-worker that
some of our third-party library headers include swi
--- Comment #5 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:38 ---
Thanks for the quick response and the links. FYI, the latter link seems to be
broken:
http://archives.free.net.ph/message/20071001.204624.0ca57fae.de.html
Is there any particular reason for changing the docs
--- Comment #2 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=15278)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15278&action=view)
Fix for this bug
Setting warn_switch_default = value in the OPT_Wall case of
c_common_handle_option (i
--- Comment #1 from jeff at schwabcenter dot com 2008-03-07 23:21 ---
Created an attachment (id=15277)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15277&action=view)
Preprocessed sample code
Compiling the attached file with g++ -Wall should produce "warning: sw
Mar 7 12:17:25 2008
--
Summary: -Wall should include -Wswitch-default
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot
11 matches
Mail list logo
