--- Comment #2 from jarausch at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2009-10-22
10:35 ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't think this is misparsing this at all. This is one place in the C++
> standard that says it should be parsed as a function declaration rather than a
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jarausch at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
GCC build triplet: x86-64
GCC host triplet: x86-64
GCC target triplet: x86-64
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41786
--- Comment #2 from jarausch at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2008-09-19
07:35 ---
gcc -v -save-temps -c TEST3.C
Using built-in specs.
Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with:
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.1-r1/work/gcc-4.3.1/configure --prefix=/usr
--bindir=/usr/i686-pc-linux-gnu
--- Comment #1 from jarausch at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de 2008-09-19
07:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=16360)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16360&action=view)
preprocessed failing source code
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37582
.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jarausch at igpm dot rwth-aachen dot de
GCC build triplet: i386
GCC host triplet: i386
GCC target triplet: i386
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37582
