https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892
--- Comment #31 from James Kuyper Jr. ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #29)
> On Thu, 19 Apr 2018, jameskuyper at verizon dot net wrote:
...
> > The relevant wording is "anywhere that a declaration of the complete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65892
James Kuyper Jr. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jameskuyper at verizon dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
--- Comment #12 from James Kuyper Jr. ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Bangerth from comment #2)
> I can't believe the wording means what you imply. Assume that caller
> and callee are in different translation units, then there is no
> way for the com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14319
James Kuyper Jr. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jameskuyper at verizon dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
--- Comment #2 from James Kuyper Jr.
2010-12-13 18:41:55 UTC ---
info gcc says:
Functions which would normally be built in but do not have
semantics defined by ISO C (such as `alloca' and `ffs') are not
built-in functions with `-ansi'
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46926
Summary: Paired sin() cos() calls optimized to sincos() call.
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: u
