https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
--- Comment #4 from Jacek Olczyk ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #2)
> GCC's behavior appears to be correct here (though perhaps less useful than
> Clang's). According to wg21.link/temp.deduct.general#9 a lambda expression
> isn't p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103760
Bug ID: 103760
Summary: Invalid expression inside lambda inside compound
requirement causes an error instead of concept
satisfaction failure
Product: gcc
Version
